260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30453453)
1. Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient-reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review.
Dietz N; Sharma M; Alhourani A; Ugiliweneza B; Wang D; Nuño MA; Drazin D; Boakye M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E10. PubMed ID: 30453453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Siccoli A; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E5. PubMed ID: 31042660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Predictive Models for Complications following Spinal Surgery.
Dietz N; Sharma M; Alhourani A; Ugiliweneza B; Wang D; Drazin D; Boakye M
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2020 Nov; 81(6):535-545. PubMed ID: 32797468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of the efficacy of epidural steroid injections for structural lumbar degenerative pathology.
Sivaganesan A; Chotai S; Parker SL; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):928-34. PubMed ID: 26689476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new?
Asher AM; Oleisky ER; Pennings JS; Khan I; Sivaganesan A; Devin CJ; Bydon M; Asher AL; Archer KR
Spine J; 2020 Jun; 20(6):847-856. PubMed ID: 32001385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the Carolina-Semmes Grading Scale.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Chotai S; Pfortmiller D; Sorenson JM; Foley K; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):382-390. PubMed ID: 28498068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.
Crawford CH; Carreon LY; Bydon M; Asher AL; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):709-715. PubMed ID: 28338454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in spine surgery: a systematic review.
Haws BE; Khechen B; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Bawa HS; Bohl DD; Wiggins AB; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(3):405-413. PubMed ID: 30611150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
