260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30453453)
21. Development of a preoperative predictive model for major complications following adult spinal deformity surgery.
Scheer JK; Smith JS; Schwab F; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Bess S; Daniels AH; Hart RA; Protopsaltis TS; Mundis GM; Sciubba DM; Ailon T; Burton DC; Klineberg E; Ames CP;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):736-743. PubMed ID: 28338449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
DiGiorgio AM; Mummaneni PV; Park P; Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Wang MY; Fu KM; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Slotkin JR
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 May; 48(5):E5. PubMed ID: 32357321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
Willems P
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Potential of predictive computer models for preoperative patient selection to enhance overall quality-adjusted life years gained at 2-year follow-up: a simulation in 234 patients with adult spinal deformity.
Oh T; Scheer JK; Smith JS; Hostin R; Robinson C; Gum JL; Schwab F; Hart RA; Lafage V; Burton DC; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Klineberg EO; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E2. PubMed ID: 29191094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of Postoperative Clinical Recovery of Drop Foot Attributable to Lumbar Degenerative Diseases, via a Bayesian Network.
Takenaka S; Aono H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):872-880. PubMed ID: 27913961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of pre-injection opioid use on post-injection patient-reported outcomes following epidural steroid injections for radicular pain.
Wei JJ; Chotai S; Sivaganesan A; Archer KR; Schneider BJ; Yang AJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2018 May; 18(5):788-796. PubMed ID: 28962907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.
Chang V; Schwalb JM; Nerenz DR; Pietrantoni L; Jones S; Jankowski M; Oja-Tebbe N; Bartol S; Abdulhak M
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E7. PubMed ID: 26621421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Khor S; Lavallee D; Cizik AM; Bellabarba C; Chapman JR; Howe CR; Lu D; Mohit AA; Oskouian RJ; Roh JR; Shonnard N; Dagal A; Flum DR
JAMA Surg; 2018 Jul; 153(7):634-642. PubMed ID: 29516096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A predictive model and nomogram for predicting return to work at 3 months after cervical spine surgery: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Devin CJ; Bydon M; Alvi MA; Kerezoudis P; Khan I; Sivaganesan A; McGirt MJ; Archer KR; Foley KT; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Knightly JJ; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E9. PubMed ID: 30453462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study.
Rushton AB; Verra ML; Emms A; Heneghan NR; Falla D; Reddington M; Cole AA; Willems P; Benneker L; Selvey D; Hutton M; Heymans MW; Staal JB
BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e021078. PubMed ID: 29789351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Utility for Predicting Spinal Surgery in an Integrated Spine Practice.
Babington JR; Edwards A; Wright AK; Dykstra T; Friedman AS; Sethi RK
PM R; 2018 Jul; 10(7):724-729. PubMed ID: 29288142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patient characteristics of smokers undergoing lumbar spine surgery: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Devin CJ; McCutcheon B; Chotai S; Archer KR; Nian H; Harrell FE; McGirt M; Mummaneni PV; Shaffrey CI; Foley K; Glassman SD; Bydon M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):661-669. PubMed ID: 28960162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.
van Hooff ML; Mannion AF; Staub LP; Ostelo RW; Fairbank JC
Spine J; 2016 Oct; 16(10):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 27343730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patient-reported outcome scores underestimate the impact of major complications in patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative conditions.
Gvozdyev BV; Carreon LY; Graves CM; Riley SA; McGraw KE; Head RJ; Dimar JR; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 28753065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
