These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30453902)

  • 1. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
    Munn Z; Peters MDJ; Stern C; Tufanaru C; McArthur A; Aromataris E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):143. PubMed ID: 30453902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
    Peters MD; Godfrey CM; Khalil H; McInerney P; Parker D; Soares CB
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26134548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What you need to know about scoping reviews.
    Verdejo C; Tapia-Benavente L; Schuller-Martínez B; Vergara-Merino L; Vargas-Peirano M; Silva-Dreyer AM
    Medwave; 2021 Mar; 21(2):e8144. PubMed ID: 33914717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.
    Iannizzi C; Akl EA; Kahale LA; Dorando E; Mosunmola Aminat A; Barker JM; McKenzie JE; Haddaway NR; Piechotta V; Skoetz N
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():802. PubMed ID: 35186269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Colquhoun H; Garritty CM; Hempel S; Horsley T; Langlois EV; Lillie E; O'Brien KK; Tunçalp Ӧ; Wilson MG; Zarin W; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(1):263. PubMed ID: 34625095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2119-2126. PubMed ID: 33038124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols.
    Peters MDJ; Godfrey C; McInerney P; Khalil H; Larsen P; Marnie C; Pollock D; Tricco AC; Munn Z
    JBI Evid Synth; 2022 Apr; 20(4):953-968. PubMed ID: 35102103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
    Peters MDJ; Marnie C; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Munn Z; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Khalil H
    JBI Evid Implement; 2021 Mar; 19(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 33570328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review.
    Tricco AC; Cardoso R; Thomas SM; Motiwala S; Sullivan S; Kealey MR; Hemmelgarn B; Ouimet M; Hillmer MP; Perrier L; Shepperd S; Straus SE
    Implement Sci; 2016 Jan; 11():4. PubMed ID: 26753923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance.
    Robinson KA; Chou R; Berkman ND; Newberry SJ; Fu R; Hartling L; Dryden D; Butler M; Foisy M; Anderson J; Motu'apuaka M; Relevo R; Guise JM; Chang S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():38-44. PubMed ID: 26261004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.
    Mueller M; D'Addario M; Egger M; Cevallos M; Dekkers O; Mugglin C; Scott P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews.
    Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 122.