These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30455610)
1. Combining A4R and MCDA in priority setting for health. Daniels N Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2018; 16(Suppl 1):51. PubMed ID: 30455610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Maluka S; Kamuzora P; Sansebastián M; Byskov J; Ndawi B; Olsen ØE; Hurtig AK Implement Sci; 2011 Feb; 6():11. PubMed ID: 21310021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting? Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Healthcare priority setting in Kenya: a gap analysis applying the accountability for reasonableness framework. Bukachi SA; Onyango-Ouma W; Siso JM; Nyamongo IK; Mutai JK; Hurtig AK; Olsen OE; Byskov J Int J Health Plann Manage; 2014; 29(4):342-61. PubMed ID: 23775594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study. Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Priority setting in HIV/AIDS control in West Java Indonesia: an evaluation based on the accountability for reasonableness framework. Tromp N; Prawiranegara R; Subhan Riparev H; Siregar A; Sunjaya D; Baltussen R Health Policy Plan; 2015 Apr; 30(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 24740708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conceptualizations of fairness and legitimacy in the context of Ethiopian health priority setting: Reflections on the applicability of accountability for reasonableness. Petricca K; Bekele A Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 28544136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public legitimacy of healthcare resource allocation committees: lessons learned from assessing an Israeli case study. Assor Y; Greenberg D BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jun; 22(1):737. PubMed ID: 35655271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Priority setting in neurosurgery as exemplified by an everyday challenge. Ibrahim GM; Tymianski M; Bernstein M Can J Neurol Sci; 2013 May; 40(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23603175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Moving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness - A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study. Wagner M; Samaha D; Casciano R; Brougham M; Abrishami P; Petrie C; Avouac B; Mantovani L; Sarría-Santamera A; Kind P; Schlander M; Tringali M Int J Health Policy Manag; 2019 Jul; 8(7):424-443. PubMed ID: 31441279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Maluka S; Kamuzora P; San Sebastiån M; Byskov J; Olsen ØE; Shayo E; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK Soc Sci Med; 2010 Aug; 71(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 20554365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria Used for Priority-Setting for Public Health Resource Allocation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Kaur G; Prinja S; Lakshmi PVM; Downey L; Sharma D; Teerawattananon Y Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019; 35(6):474-483. PubMed ID: 31307561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancing methods for health priority setting practice through the contribution of systems theory: Lessons from a case study in Ethiopia. Petricca K; Bekele A; Berta W; Gibson J; Pain C Soc Sci Med; 2018 Feb; 198():165-174. PubMed ID: 29367105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Knowledge Translation in Practice: Exploring the Potential Use of MCDA in Central America and the Caribbean. Espinoza MA; Rojas R; Acosta de Patiño H Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 Dec; 17():148-149. PubMed ID: 30184512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs. Iskrov G; Miteva-Katrandzhieva T; Stefanov R Front Public Health; 2016; 4():214. PubMed ID: 27747207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England. Kieslich K; Littlejohns P BMJ Open; 2015 Jul; 5(7):e007908. PubMed ID: 26163034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How have systematic priority setting approaches influenced policy making? A synthesis of the current literature. Kapiriri L; Razavi D Health Policy; 2017 Sep; 121(9):937-946. PubMed ID: 28734682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accountability for reasonableness: opening the black box of process. Hasman A; Holm S Health Care Anal; 2005 Dec; 13(4):261-73. PubMed ID: 16435464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Balancing efficiency, equity and feasibility of HIV treatment in South Africa - development of programmatic guidance. Baltussen R; Mikkelsen E; Tromp N; Hurtig A; Byskov J; Olsen O; Bærøe K; Hontelez JA; Singh J; Norheim OF Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2013 Oct; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 24107435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond the numbers: a critique of quantitative multi-criteria decision analysis. DiStefano MJ; Krubiner CB Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Jul; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 32605684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]