These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30455611)

  • 21. Investigating public preferences on 'severity of health' as a relevant condition for setting healthcare priorities.
    Green C
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jun; 68(12):2247-55. PubMed ID: 19406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementation of the Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) tool in a local public health setting: challenges, facilitators, and impacts.
    Sadare O; Williams M; Simon L
    Can J Public Health; 2020 Apr; 111(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 31755052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.
    Farmakas A; Theodorou M; Galanis P; Karayiannis G; Ghobrial S; Polyzos N; Papastavrou E; Agapidaki E; Souliotis K
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2017; 15():16. PubMed ID: 28808427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are we asking the right questions? Working with the LGBTQ+ community to prioritise healthcare research themes.
    Crowe S; Barker E; Roberts M; Lloyd L; de Barros CM; Rebelo-Harris B; Meads C; Saunders CL
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Sep; 7(1):64. PubMed ID: 34556178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid Development of a Tool for Prioritizing Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 for Intensive Care.
    Roy M; Hansen P; Sullivan T; Ombler F; Kiore M; Stapleton A; Carr C
    Crit Care Explor; 2021 Mar; 3(3):e0368. PubMed ID: 33786444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
    Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
    Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integrating Citizens Juries and Discrete Choice Experiments: Methodological issues in the measurement of public values in healthcare priority setting.
    Schoon R; Chi C
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 309():115223. PubMed ID: 35969981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
    Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient and public engagement in priority setting: A systematic rapid review of the literature.
    Manafò E; Petermann L; Vandall-Walker V; Mason-Lai P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193579. PubMed ID: 29499043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care models of service delivery: a scoping review protocol.
    Harfield S; Davy C; Kite E; McArthur A; Munn Z; Brown N; Brown A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Nov; 13(11):43-51. PubMed ID: 26657463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does moral reasoning influence public values for health care priority setting?: A population-based randomized stated preference survey.
    Denburg AE; Ungar WJ; Chen S; Hurley J; Abelson J
    Health Policy; 2020 Jun; 124(6):647-658. PubMed ID: 32405121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acute rheumatic fever in the Waikato District Health Board region of New Zealand: 1998-2004.
    Atatoa-Carr P; Bell A; Lennon DR
    N Z Med J; 2008 Nov; 121(1285):96-105. PubMed ID: 19079442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature.
    Cromwell I; Peacock SJ; Mitton C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Apr; 15():164. PubMed ID: 25927636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Community views on factors affecting medicines resource allocation: cross-sectional survey of 3080 adults in Australia.
    Chim L; Salkeld G; Kelly PJ; Lipworth W; Hughes DA; Stockler MR
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Jul; 43(3):254-260. PubMed ID: 29669674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accounting for equity considerations in cost-effectiveness analysis: a systematic review of rotavirus vaccine in low- and middle-income countries.
    Boujaoude MA; Mirelman AJ; Dalziel K; Carvalho N
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2018; 16():18. PubMed ID: 29796012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand.
    Leopold C; Lu CY; Wagner AK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Apr; 20(1):351. PubMed ID: 32334579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Describing practices of priority setting and resource allocation in publicly funded health care systems of high-income countries.
    Seixas BV; Regier DA; Bryan S; Mitton C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):90. PubMed ID: 33499854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New Zealand's Auckland region: a comparison between the clinical priority assessment criteria score and the actual clinical priority assigned.
    Seddon M; Broad J; Crengle S; Bramley D; Jackson R; White H
    N Z Med J; 2006 Mar; 119(1230):U1881. PubMed ID: 16532047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.