These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30456708)

  • 1. Application of a pixel-shifted linear interpolation technique for reducing the projection number in tomosynthesis imaging.
    Fukui R; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Mar; 12(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 30456708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of dose reduction in tomosynthesis.
    Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):258-69. PubMed ID: 20175489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cascaded systems analysis of shift-variant image quality in slit-scanning breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4392-4401. PubMed ID: 30091470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Tucker AW; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031917. PubMed ID: 23464332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of averaging adjacent planes for artifact reduction in matrix inversion tomosynthesis.
    Godfrey DJ; McAdams HP; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021907. PubMed ID: 23387755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized image acquisition for breast tomosynthesis in projection and reconstruction space.
    Chawla AS; Lo JY; Baker JA; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4859-69. PubMed ID: 19994493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trials.
    Mackenzie A; Marshall NW; Hadjipanteli A; Dance DR; Bosmans H; Young KC
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2376-2397. PubMed ID: 28151431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power spectrum analysis of the x-ray scatter signal in mammography and breast tomosynthesis projections.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Fei B
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101905. PubMed ID: 24089907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of photon-counting multislit breast tomosynthesis.
    Berggren K; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 29159881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.
    Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Wu T; Rafferty EA; Moore R; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91. PubMed ID: 16532956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.
    Zhou J; Zhao B; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):1098-109. PubMed ID: 17441255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
    Marshall NW; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7629-50. PubMed ID: 23123601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O thin-film transistor active pixel sensor x-ray imager for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Kanicki J
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091902. PubMed ID: 25186389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images.
    Engstrom E; Reiser I; Nishikawa R
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1753-8. PubMed ID: 19544793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.