These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30457038)

  • 41. Is the SNARC effect related to the level of mathematics? No systematic relationship observed despite more power, more repetitions, and more direct assessment of arithmetic skill.
    Cipora K; Nuerk HC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(10):1974-91. PubMed ID: 23473520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
    Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The SNARC effect is not a unitary phenomenon.
    Basso Moro S; Dell'Acqua R; Cutini S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):688-695. PubMed ID: 29264847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response.
    Galarraga DB; Pratt J; Cochrane BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):808-817. PubMed ID: 34344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of time units on the flexibility of the spatial numerical association of response codes effect.
    Zhao T; He X; Zhao X; Huang J; Zhang W; Wu S; Chen Q
    Br J Psychol; 2018 May; 109(2):299-320. PubMed ID: 29044461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Attention allows the SNARC effect to operate on multiple number lines.
    Weis T; Nuerk HC; Lachmann T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13778. PubMed ID: 30214027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association.
    Hoffmann D; Mussolin C; Martin R; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85048. PubMed ID: 24416338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.
    Aleotti S; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 35960336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task.
    Zhou X; Chen C; Chen L; Dong Q
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1525-36. PubMed ID: 17707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; McCandliss BD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95756. PubMed ID: 24760048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A cross-sectional developmental examination of the SNARC effect in a visually-guided grasping task.
    Mills KJ; Rousseau BR; Gonzalez CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():99-106. PubMed ID: 24732383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Goal-directed reaching: the SNARC effect influences movement planning but not movement execution.
    Bingley T; Heath M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(3):223-40. PubMed ID: 21864464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Separate mechanisms for magnitude and order processing in the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect: The strange case of musical note values.
    Prpic V; Fumarola A; De Tommaso M; Luccio R; Murgia M; Agostini T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1241-51. PubMed ID: 26950384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.