245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30457888)
1. DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method
Zizka VMA; Leese F; Peinert B; Geiger MF
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):122-136. PubMed ID: 30457888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting.
Beentjes KK; Speksnijder AGCL; Schilthuizen M; Hoogeveen M; Pastoor R; van der Hoorn BB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226527. PubMed ID: 31841568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biodiversity assessments in the 21st century: the potential of insect traps to complement environmental samples for estimating eukaryotic and prokaryotic diversity using high-throughput DNA metabarcoding
Ritter CD; Häggqvist S; Karlsson D; Sääksjärvi IE; Muasya AM; Nilsson RH; Antonelli A
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):147-159. PubMed ID: 30673361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of destructive and nondestructive DNA extraction methods for the metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples.
Kirse A; Bourlat SJ; Langen K; Zapke B; Zizka VMA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 35932285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disentangling bias for non-destructive insect metabarcoding.
Martoni F; Piper AM; Rodoni BC; Blacket MJ
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12981. PubMed ID: 35228909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hidden diversity: DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities.
Gleason JE; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
BMC Ecol Evol; 2023 May; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 37198575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding?
Carew ME; Coleman RA; Hoffmann AA
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4980. PubMed ID: 29915700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling technical and biological biases in macroinvertebrate community assessment from bulk preservative using multiple metabarcoding markers.
Martins FMS; Porto M; Feio MJ; Egeter B; Bonin A; Serra SRQ; Taberlet P; Beja P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3221-3238. PubMed ID: 32860303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Priming of a DNA metabarcoding approach for species identification and inventory in marine macrobenthic communities.
Hollatz C; Leite BR; Lobo J; Froufe H; Egas C; Costa FO
Genome; 2017 Mar; 60(3):260-271. PubMed ID: 28145743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persisting roadblocks in arthropod monitoring using non-destructive metabarcoding from collection media of passive traps.
Sire L; Schmidt Yáñez P; Bézier A; Courtial B; Mbedi S; Sparmann S; Larrieu L; Rougerie R; Bouget C; Monaghan MT; Herniou EA; Lopez-Vaamonde C
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16022. PubMed ID: 37842065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing DNA metabarcoding performance and applicability with bait capture enrichment and DNA from conservative ethanol.
Gauthier M; Konecny-Dupré L; Nguyen A; Elbrecht V; Datry T; Douady C; Lefébure T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 31484209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: Testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering.
Meyer A; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Ficetola GF; Beisel JN; Bouquerel J; Wagner P; Gaboriaud C; Leese F; Dejean T; Taberlet P; Usseglio-Polatera P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 33150613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA metabarcoding improves the detection of multiple stressor responses of stream invertebrates to increased salinity, fine sediment deposition and reduced flow velocity.
Beermann AJ; Werner MT; Elbrecht V; Zizka VMA; Leese F
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jan; 750():141969. PubMed ID: 33182191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Watered-down biodiversity? A comparison of metabarcoding results from DNA extracted from matched water and bulk tissue biomonitoring samples.
Hajibabaei M; Porter TM; Robinson CV; Baird DJ; Shokralla S; Wright MTG
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225409. PubMed ID: 31830042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA.
Freeland JR
Genome; 2017 Apr; 60(4):358-374. PubMed ID: 28177833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring.
Martins FMS; Galhardo M; Filipe AF; Teixeira A; Pinheiro P; Paupério J; Alves PC; Beja P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):863-876. PubMed ID: 30901128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol.
Hajibabaei M; Spall JL; Shokralla S; van Konynenburg S
BMC Ecol; 2012 Dec; 12():28. PubMed ID: 23259585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
