These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30458262)

  • 1. Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Stone J; Gurunathan U; Glass K; Munn Z; Tugwell P; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():51-59. PubMed ID: 30458262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias.
    Lu H; Gonsalves GS; Westreich D
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(3):407-409. PubMed ID: 37939152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.
    Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics.
    Papageorgiou SN; Xavier GM; Cobourne MT; Eliades T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():44-52. PubMed ID: 29705094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology.
    Oliveras I; Losilla JM; Vives J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():59-70. PubMed ID: 28499846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.
    De Vito C; Manzoli L; Marzuillo C; Anastasi D; Boccia A; Villari P
    Vaccine; 2007 Dec; 25(52):8794-806. PubMed ID: 18035456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atypical antipsychotics for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and youths.
    Loy JH; Merry SN; Hetrick SE; Stasiak K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008559. PubMed ID: 22972123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modeling may have less limitations than other approaches.
    Stone JC; Glass K; Munn Z; Tugwell P; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():36-45. PubMed ID: 31541691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies.
    Jamshidi L; Heyvaert M; Declercq L; Fernández-Castilla B; Ferron JM; Moeyaert M; Beretvas SN; Onghena P; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():97-115. PubMed ID: 29289406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study.
    Page MJ; Forbes A; Chau M; Green SE; McKenzie JE
    BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e011863. PubMed ID: 27121706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis.
    Losilla JM; Oliveras I; Marin-Garcia JA; Vives J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():61-72. PubMed ID: 29864541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collider bias in trauma comparative effectiveness research: the stratification blues for systematic reviews.
    Del Junco DJ; Bulger EM; Fox EE; Holcomb JB; Brasel KJ; Hoyt DB; Grady JJ; Duran S; Klotz P; Dubick MA; Wade CE;
    Injury; 2015 May; 46(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 25766096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.
    Kunz R; Vist G; Oxman AD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000012. PubMed ID: 17443633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.