260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30458521)
1. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interindividual variability in the benefits of personal sound amplification products on speech perception in noise: A randomized cross-over clinical trial.
Perron M; Lau B; Alain C
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288434. PubMed ID: 37467243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Choi JE; Kim J; Yoon SH; Hong SH; Moon IJ
J Audiol Otol; 2020 Apr; 24(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 31842534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing and Speech Perception for People With Hearing Loss Using Personal Sound Amplification Products.
Kim GY; Kim S; Jo M; Seol HY; Cho YS; Lim J; Moon IJ
J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(12):e94. PubMed ID: 35347902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
