185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30458825)
1. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Li L; Smith HE; Atun R; Tudor Car L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):MR000041. PubMed ID: 30860595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.
Justesen T; Freyberg J; Schultz ANØ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33941105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.
Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM; Anderson P
Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():115. PubMed ID: 24360284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.
Escobar Liquitay CM; Garegnani L; Garrote V; Solà I; Franco JV
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 9(9):MR000054. PubMed ID: 37681507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Searches for randomized controlled trials of drugs in MEDLINE and EMBASE using only generic drug names compared with searches applied in current practice in systematic reviews.
Waffenschmidt S; Guddat C
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26099486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?
Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL
Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance.
Casey M; Raynor M; Jacob C; Sharp S; McFarlane E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):903-912. PubMed ID: 32985071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to perform a comprehensive search for FDG-PET literature.
Mijnhout GS; Hooft L; van Tulder MW; Devillé WL; Teule GJ; Hoekstra OS
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Jan; 27(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 10654153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase.
Stewart F; Fraser C; Robertson C; Avenell A; Archibald D; Douglas F; Hoddinott P; van Teijlingen E; Boyers D
Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; 3():78. PubMed ID: 25033713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?
Wilkins T; Gillies RA; Davies K
Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
