262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30460354)
1. Microhardness and SEM-EDX Analysis of Permanent Enamel Surface Adjacent to Fluoride-releasing Restorative Materials Under Severe Cariogenic Challenges.
Özveren N; Özalp Ş
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2018; 16(5):417-424. PubMed ID: 30460354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Fluoride-releasing Dental Restorative Materials to Prevent Enamel Demineralization: An
Dhananjaya KM; Chakraborty M; Vadavadagi SV; Sinha G; Verma T; Deb S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Nov; 22(11):1292-1296. PubMed ID: 35343456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Fluoride-containing Restorative Materials on Dentin Adhesion and Demineralization of Hard Tissues Adjacent to Restorations.
Almeida Ayres AP; Tabchoury CP; Bittencourt Berger S; Yamauti M; Bovi Ambrosano GM; Giannini M
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 26258176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of three fluoride regimens on enamel remineralization.
Marinelli CB; Donly KJ; Wefel JS; Jakobsen JR; Denehy GE
Caries Res; 1997; 31(6):418-22. PubMed ID: 9353580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cariostatic effect of fluoride-containing restorative materials associated with fluoride gels on root dentin.
Borges FT; Campos WR; Munari LS; Moreira AN; Paiva SM; Magalhães CS
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 21085800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of open-sandwich vs. adhesive restorative techniques on enamel and dentine demineralization: an in situ study.
Kirsten GA; Rached RN; Mazur RF; Vieira S; Souza EM
J Dent; 2013 Oct; 41(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 23851134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of self versus professionally applied remineralizing materials.
Trairatvorakul C; Kangvansurakit N; Pathomburi J
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 20831134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study of the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on remineralization in an enamel erosion model.
Zhou SL; Zhou J; Watanabe S; Watanabe K; Wen LY; Xuan K
J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 22227269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Potential of a Bioactive, Pre-reacted, Glass-Ionomer Filler Resin Composite to Inhibit the Demineralization of Enamel in Vitro.
Leão IF; Araújo N; Scotti CK; Mondelli R; de Amoêdo Campos Velo MM; Bombonatti J
Oper Dent; 2021 Jan; 46(1):E11-E20. PubMed ID: 33882141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
Donly KJ; Segura A
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An alkasite restorative material effectively remineralized artificial interproximal enamel caries in vitro.
Theerarath T; Sriarj W
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jun; 26(6):4437-4445. PubMed ID: 35190884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical study of the caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations: aging versus the influence of fluoride dentifrice.
de Moraes MD; de Melo MA; Bezerra Dda S; Costa LS; Saboía Vde P; Rodrigues LK
J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 May; 7(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 25573328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inhibition Effects of Different Toothpastes on Demineralisation of Incipient Enamel Lesions.
Altan H; Göztaş Z; Kahraman K; Kuş M; Tosun G
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2019; 17(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 30874251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro evaluation of the cariostatic action of esthetic restorative materials in bovine teeth under severe cariogenic challenge.
Pin ML; Abdo RC; Machado MA; da Silva SM; Pavarini A; Marta SN
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 15986958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro.
Creanor SL; Awawdeh LA; Saunders WP; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):527-31. PubMed ID: 9699447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of enamel/restoration interface submitted cariogenic challenge and fluoride release.
Rodrigues RV; Sampaio CS; Girotto AC; Pinhatti CP; Iwamoto AS; de Freitas AZ; Ambrosano GMB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Pascon FM
Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Dec; 84(12):2857-2866. PubMed ID: 34048111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
