138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30460577)
1. Feasibility of PET/CT system performance harmonisation for quantitative multicentre
Kaalep A; Huisman M; Sera T; Vugts D; Boellaard R; ; ;
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Nov; 5(1):26. PubMed ID: 30460577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Rijnsdorp S; Yaqub M; Talsma A; Lodge MA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1344-1361. PubMed ID: 29500480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.
Kaalep A; Sera T; Oyen W; Krause BJ; Chiti A; Liu Y; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 45(3):412-422. PubMed ID: 29192365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicentre quantitative
Huizing DMV; Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Gotthardt M; Boellaard R; Sera T; Sinaasappel M; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 31705215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.
Makris NE; Huisman MC; Kinahan PE; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Oct; 40(10):1507-15. PubMed ID: 23754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data.
van Sluis J; van Snick JH; Brouwers AH; Noordzij W; Dierckx RAJO; Borra RJH; Slart RHJA; Lammertsma AA; Glaudemans AWJM; Boellaard R; Tsoumpas C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Nov; 49(13):4652-4660. PubMed ID: 35876867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Lasnon C; Majdoub M; Lavigne B; Do P; Madelaine J; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Dec; 43(13):2324-2335. PubMed ID: 27325312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom.
Mansor S; Pfaehler E; Heijtel D; Lodge MA; Boellaard R; Yaqub M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6413-6424. PubMed ID: 28994465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.
Houdu B; Lasnon C; Licaj I; Thomas G; Do P; Guizard AV; Desmonts C; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):421-428. PubMed ID: 30218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positron emission tomography PET/CT harmonisation study of different clinical PET/CT scanners using commercially available software.
Lowe G; Spottiswoode B; Declerck J; Sullivan K; Sharif MS; Wong WL; Sanghera B
BJR Open; 2020; 2(1):20190035. PubMed ID: 33178963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SUV variability in EARL-accredited conventional and digital PET.
Koopman D; Jager PL; Slump CH; Knollema S; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Dec; 9(1):106. PubMed ID: 31823097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications.
Koopman D; Groot Koerkamp M; Jager PL; Arkies H; Knollema S; Slump CH; Sanches PG; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 28144857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance.
Makris NE; Boellaard R; Visser EP; de Jong JR; Vanderlinden B; Wierts R; van der Veen BJ; Greuter HJ; Vugts DJ; van Dongen GA; Lammertsma AA; Huisman MC
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):264-7. PubMed ID: 24357686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in PET image quality and quantification measured with a permanently filled
Sipilä O; Liukkonen J; Halme HL; Tolvanen T; Sohlberg A; Hakulinen M; Manninen AL; Tahvanainen K; Tunninen V; Ollikainen T; Kangasmaa T; Kangasmäki A; Vuorela J
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jun; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 37322376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter quantitative
Vosoughi H; Momennezhad M; Emami F; Hajizadeh M; Rahmim A; Geramifar P
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2218-2233. PubMed ID: 37064407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
