BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30461042)

  • 1. A burden from birth? Non-invasive prenatal testing and the stigmatization of people with disabilities.
    Rubeis G; Steger F
    Bioethics; 2019 Jan; 33(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30461042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
    Shakespeare T
    Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Societal attitude and behaviours towards women with disabilities in rural Nepal: pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood.
    Devkota HR; Kett M; Groce N
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):20. PubMed ID: 30626360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The meaning of the act: reflections on the expressive force of reproductive decision making and policies.
    Nelson JL
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Jun; 8(2):165-82. PubMed ID: 11655298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parental expectations of raising a child with disability in decision-making for prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy: A mixed methods study.
    Ngan OMY; Yi H; Bryant L; Sahota DS; Chan OYM; Ahmed S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2020 Nov; 103(11):2373-2383. PubMed ID: 32507714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "The Top Priority Is a Healthy Baby": Narratives of Health, Disability, and Abortion in Online Pregnancy Forum Discussions in the US and China.
    Li G; Chandrasekharan S; Allyse M
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Feb; 26(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 27277130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prenatal screening and its impact on persons with disabilities.
    Kaplan D
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 36(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 8403607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Against selection of human life -- people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling.
    Waldschmidt A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11653997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The stigma of disability: Croatian experiences.
    Buljevac M; Majdak M; Leutar Z
    Disabil Rehabil; 2012; 34(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 21992508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnant women's experiences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan: A qualitative study.
    Yamamoto K; Chang H; Fukushima A
    J Genet Couns; 2022 Apr; 31(2):338-355. PubMed ID: 34432354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. For your interest? The ethical acceptability of using non-invasive prenatal testing to test 'purely for information'.
    Deans Z; Clarke AJ; Newson AJ
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25521970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The moral implications of prenatal genetic testing.
    Chipman P
    Penn Bioeth J; 2006; 2(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 17146901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.
    Kater-Kuipers A; Bunnik EM; de Beaufort ID; Galjaard RJH
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 30340550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling.
    Warton C; Johnston M; Mills C
    J Genet Couns; 2023 Jun; 32(3):576-583. PubMed ID: 36765016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
    Charo RA
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who should pay for bad genes?
    Rakowski E
    Calif Law Rev; 2002 Oct; 90(5):1345-414. PubMed ID: 12436972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.
    Haidar H; Vanstone M; Laberge AM; Bibeau G; Ghulmiyyah L; Ravitsky V
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 29847254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics.
    Degener T
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues.
    Minear MA; Alessi S; Allyse M; Michie M; Chandrasekharan S
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2015; 16():369-98. PubMed ID: 26322648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations.
    Parens E; Asch A
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 12587137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.