These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30461076)
1. Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5. Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Kume H Int J Urol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 30461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial. Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Barratt D; Charman SC; Freeman A; Hawkes D; Hu Y; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; Punwani S; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 30017964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men. Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy? Song G; Ruan M; Wang H; Fan Y; He Q; Lin Z; Li X; Li P; Wang X; He Z; Zhou L J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32716686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Hanna N; Wszolek MF; Mojtahed A; Nicaise E; Wu B; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt FJ; Salari K; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):944-951. PubMed ID: 31144593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy in daily practice: Results of a multicenter study of 2115 patients. Oderda M; Marra G; Albisinni S; Altobelli E; Baco E; Beatrici V; Cantiani A; Carbone A; Ciccariello M; Descotes JL; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Eldred-Evans D; Fasolis G; Ferriero M; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Kumar P; Lacetera V; Mozer P; Muto G; Papalia R; Pastore A; Peltier A; Piechaud T; Simone G; Roche JB; Roupret M; Rouviere O; Van Velthoven R; Gontero P Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):990-997. PubMed ID: 30187529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years. Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Deng FM; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29886090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies. Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer. Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy. Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy. Hansen NL; Kesch C; Barrett T; Koo B; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Warren AY; Wieczorek K; Hohenfellner M; Kastner C; Hadaschik B BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 27862869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer. Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy. Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Multicenter Study of the Clinical Utility of Nontargeted Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Pre-Biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; van Son M; Hosking-Jervis F; Bertoncelli Tanaka M; Reddy D; Bass EJ; Powell L; Ahmad S; Pegers E; Joshi S; Sri D; Wong K; Tam H; Hrouda D; Qazi H; Gordon S; Winkler M; Ahmed HU J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 32516029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results. Hansen N; Patruno G; Wadhwa K; Gaziev G; Miano R; Barrett T; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Warren A; Bratt O; Kastner C Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 26995327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Koch R; Wirth M; Zastrow S BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):873-9. PubMed ID: 25523210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer. Raman AG; Sarma KV; Raman SS; Priester AM; Mirak SA; Riskin-Jones HH; Dhinagar N; Speier W; Felker E; Sisk AE; Lu D; Kinnaird A; Reiter RE; Marks LS; Arnold CW J Urol; 2021 Sep; 206(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 33908801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI-ultrasonography software fusion prostate biopsy: initial results using a stereotactic robotic-assisted transperineal prostate biopsy platform comparing systematic vs targeted biopsy. Lee AYM; Yang XY; Lee HJ; Law YM; Huang HH; Lau WKO; Lee LS; Ho HSS; Tay KJ; Cheng CWS; Yuen JSP; Chen K BJU Int; 2020 Nov; 126(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 32438463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]