328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30461125)
1. Direct 3D Printing of Flexible Nasal Prosthesis: Optimized Digital Workflow from Scan to Fit.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh MM; Alnazzawi A; Al-Rabab'ah M; Kamel B; Jaradat E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 30461125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of negative molds technology based on three-dimensional printing in digital maxillofacial prostheses].
Gu XY; Chen XB; Jiao T; Zhang FQ; Jiang XQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):336-341. PubMed ID: 28613053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow.
Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Brom J; Huettig F; Keutel C
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 29429837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh M; Watson J; Al-Wahadni AM; Alzoubi F; Murad M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e502-5. PubMed ID: 26221855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 31610244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.
Beri A; Pisulkar SK; Bagde AD; Bansod A; Dahihandekar C; Paikrao B
Trials; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1048. PubMed ID: 36575547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Use of Three-Dimensional Photography and Printing in the Fabrication of a Nasal Prosthesis.
Denour E; Woo AS; Crozier J; Van Dongen C
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):e488-e491. PubMed ID: 32472877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Noncontact Facial Topography Mapping, 3-Dimensional Printing, and Silicone Casting of Orbital Prosthesis.
Weisson EH; Fittipaldi M; Concepcion CA; Pelaez D; Grace L; Tse DT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 220():27-36. PubMed ID: 32707202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of digital technology in the workflow for an osseointegrated implant-retained nasal prosthesis: A clinical report.
McHutchion L; Kincade C; Wolfaardt J
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):858-862. PubMed ID: 30782455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplifying the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing using a three-dimensional (3D) database: setup, development, and aspects of virtual data validation for reproduction.
Unkovskiy A; Roehler A; Huettig F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Brom J; Keutel C; Spintzyk S
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jul; 63(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 30792148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel digital workflow to manufacture personalized three-dimensional-printed hollow surgical obturators after maxillectomy.
Kortes J; Dehnad H; Kotte ANT; Fennis WMM; Rosenberg AJWP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 47(9):1214-1218. PubMed ID: 29636308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation of tissue-prosthesis margin interface by using surface scanning and digital design for auricular prostheses.
McHutchion L; Aalto D
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):361-372. PubMed ID: 32336538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complete integration of technology for improved reproduction of auricular prostheses.
Watson J; Hatamleh MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 24445032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-retained nasal prosthesis for a patient following partial rhinectomy: a clinical report.
Guttal SS; Patil NP; Thakur S; Kumar S; Kulkarni SS
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 19210608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate Teeth in Fibulas: Planning and Digital Workflow With Point-of-Care 3D Printing.
Williams FC; Hammer DA; Wentland TR; Kim RY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Aug; 78(8):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 32404269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a 3D printable maxillofacial silicone: Part II. Optimization of moderator and thixotropic agent.
Jindal SK; Sherriff M; Waters MG; Smay JE; Coward TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 28645662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Missing facial parts computed by a morphable model and transferred directly to a polyamide laser-sintered prosthesis: an innovation study.
Mueller AA; Paysan P; Schumacher R; Zeilhofer HF; Berg-Boerner BI; Maurer J; Vetter T; Schkommodau E; Juergens P; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 49(8):e67-71. PubMed ID: 21458119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A preliminary study on the cavity forming of the facial prostheses based on three dimensional printing].
Sun J; Zhang FQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):773-4. PubMed ID: 21211249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nasal prosthesis rehabilitation using CAD-CAM technology after total rhinectomy: a pilot study.
Qiu J; Gu XY; Xiong YY; Zhang FQ
Support Care Cancer; 2011 Jul; 19(7):1055-9. PubMed ID: 21523350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
