These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30461155)

  • 1. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
    Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
    Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
    Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
    Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
    Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Randomized Study Comparing Skin Staples with Subcuticular Sutures for Wound Closure at Caesarean Section in Black-Skinned Women.
    Abdus-Salam RA; Bello FA; Olayemi O
    Int Sch Res Notices; 2014; 2014():807937. PubMed ID: 27437457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.