These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30461387)

  • 1. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
    Rasetshwane DM; Raybine DA; Kopun JG; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM; High RR; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Gorga MP; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2994. PubMed ID: 29857738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.
    Souza P; Arehart K; Schoof T; Anderson M; Strori D; Balmert L
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1280-1292. PubMed ID: 30998547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape.
    Fogerty D; Madorskiy R; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4289-4299. PubMed ID: 33197359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of compression release time of a hearing aid on sentence recognition and the quality judgment of speech.
    Shetty HN; Raju S
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(103):232-241. PubMed ID: 32978360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.
    Reed CM; Braida LD; Zurek PM
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Mar; 13(1):4-43. PubMed ID: 19074452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.
    Perry TT; Nelson PB; Van Tasell DJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519837124. PubMed ID: 30880645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Audibility and Distortion on Recognition of Reverberant Speech for Children and Adults with Hearing Aid Amplification.
    Brennan MA; McCreery RW; Massey J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):170-180. PubMed ID: 34695870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of the Russian Matrix test - effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level.
    Warzybok A; Zhilinskaya E; Goykhburg M; Tavartkiladze G; Kollmeier B; Boboshko M
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):930-940. PubMed ID: 32815756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
    Johnson EE
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Hearing Loss on Localization of Amplitude-Panned and Physical Sources.
    Ellis GM; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Oct; 31(9):690-698. PubMed ID: 33032338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss.
    Brennan MA; McCreery R; Kopun J; Hoover B; Alexander J; Lewis D; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):983-98. PubMed ID: 25514451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain Shaping Preferences for Hearing Aid-Amplified Speech and Music.
    Vaisberg JM; Beaulac S; Glista D; Macpherson EA; Scollie SD
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521989900. PubMed ID: 33563136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust Data-Driven Auditory Profiling Towards Precision Audiology.
    Sanchez-Lopez R; Fereczkowski M; Neher T; Santurette S; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520973539. PubMed ID: 33272110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can Dual Compression Offer Better Mandarin Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality Than Fast-Acting Compression?
    Chen Y; Wong LLN; Kuehnel V; Qian J; Voss SC; Shangqiguo W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521997610. PubMed ID: 33710928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on the Relationship Between the Perception of Speech in Noise and Dysarthric Speech.
    Yoho SE; Barrett TS; Borrie SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):4025-4036. PubMed ID: 37652059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners with hearing aids.
    Zaar J; Simonsen LB; Laugesen S
    Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108949. PubMed ID: 38281473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE; Srinivasan NK; Gallun FJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):144-52. PubMed ID: 26462171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-in-noise detection is related to auditory working memory precision for frequency.
    Lad M; Holmes E; Chu A; Griffiths TD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13997. PubMed ID: 32814792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.