These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30462465)

  • 21. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of midwives' and nurses' experiences of adverse labour and birth events.
    Elmir R; Pangas J; Dahlen H; Schmied V
    J Clin Nurs; 2017 Dec; 26(23-24):4184-4200. PubMed ID: 28722761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's expectations and experiences with labour pain in medical and midwifery models of birth in the United States.
    Gibson E
    Women Birth; 2014 Sep; 27(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 24933526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The birth bed: A qualitative study on the views of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space.
    Townsend B; Fenwick J; Thomson V; Foureur M
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 26386523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Formulating evidence-based guidelines for certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives attending home births.
    Cook E; Avery M; Frisvold M
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 24597859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility of pulse oximetry for assessment of infants born in community based midwifery care.
    Smit M; Ganzeboom A; Dawson JA; Walther FJ; Bustraan J; van Roosmalen JJ; te Pas AB
    Midwifery; 2014 May; 30(5):539-43. PubMed ID: 23866687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of a consensus statement on normal physiologic birth: a modified Delphi study.
    Kennedy HP; Cheyney M; Lawlor M; Myers S; Schuiling K; Tanner T; ; ;
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 25782847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Should midwives be promoting and providing home birth?
    RCM Midwives; 2005 Jul; 8(7):321. PubMed ID: 16035443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Midwives' intrapartum monitoring process and management resulting in emergency referrals in Tanzania: a qualitative study.
    Shimoda K; Leshabari S; Horiuchi S; Shimpuku Y; Tashiro J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Oct; 15():248. PubMed ID: 26449217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Should midwives be promoting and providing home birth?
    RCM Midwives; 2005 May; 8(5):234. PubMed ID: 15960336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exercise of essential competencies for midwifery care by nurses in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Narchi NZ
    Midwifery; 2011 Feb; 27(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19892446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coping and help in birth: An investigation into 'normal' childbirth as described by new mothers and their attending midwives.
    Darra S; Murphy F
    Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():18-25. PubMed ID: 27428094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Midwives are nice, but . . .": perceptions of midwifery and childbirth in an undergraduate class.
    DeJoy SB
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 20189130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.
    Nicholls S; Hauck YL; Bayes S; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():73-81. PubMed ID: 26549568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. EMPOWER! Empowering mothers, providing options with education and relaxation.
    Blease M; Williamson M; Carter S; Parker-Evans G; Darwin J
    Pract Midwife; 2017 Jun; 20(6):31-2. PubMed ID: 30462470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a bespoke training to increase uptake by midwifery teams of NICE Guidance for membrane sweeping to reduce induction of labour: a stepped wedge cluster randomised design.
    Kenyon S; Dann S; Hope L; Clarke P; Hogan A; Jenkinson D; Hemming K
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):357. PubMed ID: 28750676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of maternity care practices of skilled birth attendants in Cambodia.
    Ith P; Dawson A; Homer C
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Mar; 10(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 22405417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Client-Related Factors Associated with a "Less than Good" Experience of Midwifery Care during Childbirth in the Netherlands.
    Baas CI; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Erwich JJ; Spelten ER; de Boer MR; Hutton EK
    Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 27905662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Midwives' experiences of transfer in labour from a Western Australian birth centre to a tertiary maternity hospital.
    Kuliukas LJ; Lewis L; Hauck YL; Duggan R
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 26243498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Malawi women's knowledge and use of labour and birthing positions: A cross-sectional descriptive survey.
    Zileni BD; Glover P; Jones M; Teoh KK; Zileni CW; Muller A
    Women Birth; 2017 Feb; 30(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 27329996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.