These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 304631)

  • 1. Development of the speech reception test.
    Elkins E; Causey GD
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1977 Oct; (71):i-iv, 1-16. PubMed ID: 304631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A filtered speech test for an aging population.
    Klein H
    J S Afr Speech Hear Assoc; 1976 Dec; 23():87-97. PubMed ID: 1032688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Oriented audiological studies in the hard-of-hearing].
    Kapteyn TS; Feenstra L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1987 Apr; 131(17):698-702. PubMed ID: 3587380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The relationship between speech masking and clarity tests in hearing disorders].
    Belov IM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1968; 30(5):9-15. PubMed ID: 5739372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech reception by the hearing-impaired: methods of testing and the development of new tests.
    Levitt H; Resnick SB
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):107-30. PubMed ID: 292138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of the California Consonant Test.
    Owens E; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Sep; 20(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 904308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Modified Rhyme Test results from impaired- and normal-hearing listeners.
    Elkins EF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 5163893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional hearing level.
    Engelberg MW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 11(3):741-57. PubMed ID: 733257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reception of sentences under oral-manual interpreted and simultaneous test conditions.
    Caccamise F; Blasdell R
    Am Ann Deaf; 1977 Aug; 122(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 906954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW; Talis HP
    Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Functional hearing loss in speech audiometry (author's transl)].
    Stoll W; Kumpf W
    HNO; 1978 Jun; 26(6):206-12. PubMed ID: 669997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating speech threshold from the PI-PB function.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Aug; 102(8):487-96. PubMed ID: 942326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the threshold tone decay test. I. On the test].
    Maeda M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1966 Jan; 69(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 5182234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study.
    Korsan-Bengtsen M
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships between speech recognition threshold, average hearing level, and speech importance noise detection threshold.
    Letowski T; Hergenreder P; Tang H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1131-6. PubMed ID: 1447923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the threshold tone decay test. 2. Relationship between the T.T.D. test and other recruitment phenomenon tests].
    Maeda M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1966 Jan; 69(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 5182225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The compensation of lateral differences in hearing disorders in the testing of directional hearing by electrically produced exposure time differences].
    Matzker J
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1966 May; 45(5):331-43. PubMed ID: 5995334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Correlation between tonal and speech hearing in conductive and neuro-sensory hearing disorders].
    Shidlovskaia TV; Rozkladka AI
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1977; (5):20-5. PubMed ID: 930379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.