98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3046347)
1. Sensitivity and specificity of three methods of detecting adverse drug reactions.
Berry LL; Segal R; Sherrin TP; Fudge KA
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 Jul; 45(7):1534-9. PubMed ID: 3046347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic risk-assessment model for identifying patients with adverse drug reactions.
Tschepik W; Segal R; Sherrin TP; Schneider DN; Hammond RL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Feb; 47(2):330-4. PubMed ID: 2309721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of standardized screening procedures to identify adverse drug reactions.
Koch KE
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1314-20. PubMed ID: 2368724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidisciplinary program for detecting and evaluating adverse drug reactions.
Keith MR; Bellanger-McCleery RA; Fuchs JE
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Sep; 46(9):1809-12. PubMed ID: 2801715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved reporting of adverse drug reactions.
Kimelblatt BJ; Young SH; Heywood PM; Mandala AR; Gendelman S; Mehl B
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1988 May; 45(5):1086-9. PubMed ID: 3400650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. System for voluntary reporting of adverse drug reactions in a university hospital.
Vorce-West TE; Barstow L; Butcher B
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1989 Nov; 46(11):2300-3. PubMed ID: 2589347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of adverse drug reactions with commonly prescribed drugs in different hospitals of Kathmandu valley.
Jha N; Bajracharya O; Namgyal T
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2007; 5(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 18604084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the positive predictive values of antidote signals to detect potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the medical intensive care unit (ICU).
Kane-Gill SL; Bellamy CJ; Verrico MM; Handler SM; Weber RJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1185-91. PubMed ID: 19728294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pharmacy-coordinated program that encourages physician reporting of adverse drug reactions.
Gilroy GW; Scollins MJ; Gay CA; Harry DJ; Giannuzzi DF
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1327-33. PubMed ID: 2368726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Program coordinated by a drug information service to improve adverse drug reaction reporting in a hospital.
Michel DJ; Knodel LC
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Sep; 43(9):2202-5. PubMed ID: 3766573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multidisciplinary adverse drug reaction surveillance program.
Prosser TR; Kamysz PL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1334-9. PubMed ID: 2368727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.
Koh Y; Yap CW; Li SC
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 17921048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three algorithms used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.
Michel DJ; Knodel LC
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1709-14. PubMed ID: 3752106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in adult medical inpatients.
Bowman L; Carlstedt BC; Black CD
Can J Hosp Pharm; 1994 Oct; 47(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 10172139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adverse drug reactions: the San Juan Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center experience.
Nazario M; Feliú JF; Rivera GC
Hosp Pharm; 1994 Mar; 29(3):244-6, 249-50. PubMed ID: 10171808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a database computer program to identify trends in reporting of adverse drug reactions.
Johnston PE; Morrow JD; Branch RA
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1321-7. PubMed ID: 2368725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adverse drug reaction monitoring: comparing doctor and patient reporting for new drugs.
Jarernsiripornkul N; Kakaew W; Loalukkana W; Krska J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Mar; 18(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 19148880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a videotape on adverse drug reactions.
Morgan SA; Frank JT
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1340-2. PubMed ID: 1695062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Use of the capture-recapture method to assess the frequency of "serious" adverse drug reactions: experience of Toulouse University Hospital].
Montastruc JL; Lugardon S; Desboeuf K; Fernet P; Lapeyre-Mestre M
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2008 Feb; 192(2):421-30; discussion 430-1. PubMed ID: 18819693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an indirect method of detecting adverse reactions to anticoagulants.
Swanson CN; Keys PW
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Mar; 44(3):544-8. PubMed ID: 3565412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
