These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30463497)

  • 21. Semiparametric estimation in the proportional hazard model accounting for a misclassified cause of failure.
    Ha J; Tsodikov A
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):941-9. PubMed ID: 26102346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the beta-geometric model with landmarking for dynamic prediction of time to pregnancy.
    van Eekelen R; Putter H; McLernon DJ; Eijkemans MJ; van Geloven N
    Biom J; 2020 Jan; 62(1):175-190. PubMed ID: 31738461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
    J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1499-507. PubMed ID: 10334537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the validity of time-dependent AUC estimators.
    Schmid M; Kestler HA; Potapov S
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jan; 16(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 24036698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic predictions with time-dependent covariates in survival analysis using joint modeling and landmarking.
    Rizopoulos D; Molenberghs G; Lesaffre EMEH
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 28792080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation in the progressive illness-death model: A nonexhaustive review.
    Meira-Machado L; Sestelo M
    Biom J; 2019 Mar; 61(2):245-263. PubMed ID: 30457674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of estimators to evaluate the discriminatory power of time-to-event models.
    Schmid M; Potapov S
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2588-609. PubMed ID: 22829422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic prediction and prognostic analysis of patients with cervical cancer: a landmarking analysis approach.
    Yang Z; Hou Y; Lyu J; Liu D; Chen Z
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44():45-51. PubMed ID: 32220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic prediction of survival using multivariate functional principal component analysis: A strict landmarking approach.
    Gomon D; Putter H; Fiocco M; Signorelli M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Feb; 33(2):256-272. PubMed ID: 38196243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic pseudo-observations: a robust approach to dynamic prediction in competing risks.
    Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen JC; de Witte TM; Putter H
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):1043-52. PubMed ID: 23865523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic landmark prediction for mixture data.
    Garcia TP; Parast L
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jul; 22(3):558-574. PubMed ID: 31758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's disease progression using features of multiple longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data.
    Li K; Luo S
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(24):4804-4818. PubMed ID: 31386218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additive-multiplicative hazards regression models for interval-censored semi-competing risks data with missing intermediate events.
    Kim J; Kim J; Kim SW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30841923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tree-based models for survival data with competing risks.
    Kretowska M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():185-198. PubMed ID: 29650312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic-DeepHit: A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Survival Analysis With Competing Risks Based on Longitudinal Data.
    Lee C; Yoon J; Schaar MV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 67(1):122-133. PubMed ID: 30951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Joint modelling of repeated transitions in follow-up data--a case study on breast cancer data.
    Genser B; Wernecke KD
    Biom J; 2005 Jun; 47(3):388-401. PubMed ID: 16053262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An R
    Fournier MC; Dantan E; Blanche P
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 29205452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nonparametric estimation of transition probabilities in the non-Markov illness-death model: A comparative study.
    de Uña-Álvarez J; Meira-Machado L
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):364-75. PubMed ID: 25735883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combined dynamic predictions using joint models of two longitudinal outcomes and competing risk data.
    Andrinopoulou ER; Rizopoulos D; Takkenberg JJ; Lesaffre E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1787-1801. PubMed ID: 26059114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic clinical prediction models for discrete time-to-event data with competing risks-A case study on the OUTCOMEREA database.
    Heyard R; Timsit JF; Essaied W; Held L;
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):514-534. PubMed ID: 30221403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.