103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30463711)
1. Objective Preoperative Parameters Predict Difficult Pelvic Dissections and Clinical Outcomes.
Iqbal A; Khan A; George TJ; Tan S; Qiu P; Yang K; Trevino J; Hughes S
J Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 232():15-25. PubMed ID: 30463711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a pelvic surgery difficulty risk model to predict difficult pelvic dissection and poor outcomes.
Iqbal A; Khan A; Hughes S; George TJ; Tan S; Garcia-Chavez H; Read T
Surgery; 2023 May; 173(5):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 36801077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.
Targarona EM; Balague C; Pernas JC; Martinez C; Berindoague R; Gich I; Trias M
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 18362627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic anatomy as a factor in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective study.
Kim JY; Kim YW; Kim NK; Hur H; Lee K; Min BS; Cho HJ
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Oct; 21(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 22002269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Short-term outcome of transanal total mesorectal excision for male low rectal cancer patients with "difficult pelvis" : a single center report from Peking University Cancer Hospital].
Wu A; He G; Wang L; Dong Q; Liu X; Li Y; Leng J; Zhang X; Sun T; Zhang Y; Yao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 21(6):646-653. PubMed ID: 29968239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prognosis factors for the perineal incision complications after abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].
Luo S; Liang JW; Zhou HT; Pei W; Zhou ZX; Liu Q; Wang XS
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 55(11):842-846. PubMed ID: 29136732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender differences in pelvic anatomy and effects on rectal cancer surgery.
Seike K; Koda K; Oda K; Kosugi C; Shimizu K; Miyazaki M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(89):111-5. PubMed ID: 19453039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative Predictive Model of Narrow Pelvis in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Through Computed Tomography.
Xie R; Zu F; Lu K; Hou J; Chen M; Chen S
J Endourol; 2020 Jul; 34(7):763-769. PubMed ID: 32368932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Advances in pelvic imaging parameters predicting surgical difficulty in rectal cancer.
Zhang Q; Wei J; Chen H
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Feb; 21(1):64. PubMed ID: 36843078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining pelvic factors in sphincter-preservation of low rectal cancer with a three-dimensional digital model of pelvis.
Gu J; Bo XF; Xiong CY; Wu AW; Zhang XP; Li M; An Q; Fang J; Li J; Zhang X; Wang HY; Gao F; You WC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Oct; 49(10):1517-26. PubMed ID: 17001440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z
Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of pelvic volume on surgical outcome after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Zur Hausen G; Gröne J; Kaufmann D; Niehues SM; Aschenbrenner K; Stroux A; Hamm B; Kreis ME; Lauscher JC
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 28315018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior-entry abdominoperineal resection: a variation in the method of perineal dissection.
Simunovic M; Pinthus J; Coates AJ; DeNardi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):794-800. PubMed ID: 21861220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
