682 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30464214)
1. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.
Hughes CS; Moggridge S; Müller T; Sorensen PH; Morin GB; Krijgsveld J
Nat Protoc; 2019 Jan; 14(1):68-85. PubMed ID: 30464214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extending the Compatibility of the SP3 Paramagnetic Bead Processing Approach for Proteomics.
Moggridge S; Sorensen PH; Morin GB; Hughes CS
J Proteome Res; 2018 Apr; 17(4):1730-1740. PubMed ID: 29565595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Solvent Precipitation SP3 (SP4) Enhances Recovery for Proteomics Sample Preparation without Magnetic Beads.
Johnston HE; Yadav K; Kirkpatrick JM; Biggs GS; Oxley D; Kramer HB; Samant RS
Anal Chem; 2022 Jul; 94(29):10320-10328. PubMed ID: 35848328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Miniaturized sample preparation on a digital microfluidics device for sensitive bottom-up microproteomics of mammalian cells using magnetic beads and mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants.
Leipert J; Tholey A
Lab Chip; 2019 Oct; 19(20):3490-3498. PubMed ID: 31531506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST Protocols for Proteomic Sample Preparation in the Low Microgram Range.
Sielaff M; Kuharev J; Bohn T; Hahlbrock J; Bopp T; Tenzer S; Distler U
J Proteome Res; 2017 Nov; 16(11):4060-4072. PubMed ID: 28948796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology.
Hughes CS; Foehr S; Garfield DA; Furlong EE; Steinmetz LM; Krijgsveld J
Mol Syst Biol; 2014 Oct; 10(10):757. PubMed ID: 25358341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suspension Trapping (S-Trap) Is Compatible with Typical Protein Extraction Buffers and Detergents for Bottom-Up Proteomics.
Elinger D; Gabashvili A; Levin Y
J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 30761899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Fast and Economical Sample Preparation Protocol for Interaction Proteomics Analysis.
Gonzalez-Lozano MA; Koopmans F; Paliukhovich I; Smit AB; Li KW
Proteomics; 2019 May; 19(9):e1900027. PubMed ID: 30864274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carboxylate-Modified Magnetic Bead (CMMB)-Based Isopropanol Gradient Peptide Fractionation (CIF) Enables Rapid and Robust Off-Line Peptide Mixture Fractionation in Bottom-Up Proteomics.
Deng W; Sha J; Plath K; Wohlschlegel JA
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2021; 20():100039. PubMed ID: 33476790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.
Doellinger J; Schneider A; Hoeller M; Lasch P
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 31754045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SP3 Protocol for Proteomic Plant Sample Preparation Prior LC-MS/MS.
Mikulášek K; Konečná H; Potěšil D; Holánková R; Havliš J; Zdráhal Z
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():635550. PubMed ID: 33777071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Straightforward Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Adipose Tissue.
Pasing Y; Schniers A; Hansen T
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():289-296. PubMed ID: 28980277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Universal Solid-Phase Protein Preparation (USP
Dagley LF; Infusini G; Larsen RH; Sandow JJ; Webb AI
J Proteome Res; 2019 Jul; 18(7):2915-2924. PubMed ID: 31137935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SP3-FAIMS-Enabled High-Throughput Quantitative Profiling of the Cysteinome.
Desai HS; Yan T; Backus KM
Curr Protoc; 2022 Jul; 2(7):e492. PubMed ID: 35895291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Different Sample Preparation Protocols Reveals Lysis Buffer-Specific Extraction Biases in Gram-Negative Bacteria and Human Cells.
Glatter T; Ahrné E; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2015 Nov; 14(11):4472-85. PubMed ID: 26412744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Standardized and Reproducible Proteomics Protocol for Bottom-Up Quantitative Analysis of Protein Samples Using SP3 and Mass Spectrometry.
Hughes CS; Sorensen PH; Morin GB
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1959():65-87. PubMed ID: 30852816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An IonStar Experimental Strategy for MS1 Ion Current-Based Quantification Using Ultrahigh-Field Orbitrap: Reproducible, In-Depth, and Accurate Protein Measurement in Large Cohorts.
Shen X; Shen S; Li J; Hu Q; Nie L; Tu C; Wang X; Orsburn B; Wang J; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2017 Jul; 16(7):2445-2456. PubMed ID: 28412812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human Bone Paleoproteomics Utilizing the Single-Pot, Solid-Phase-Enhanced Sample Preparation Method to Maximize Detected Proteins and Reduce Humics.
Cleland TP
J Proteome Res; 2018 Nov; 17(11):3976-3983. PubMed ID: 30336043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Protein Capture by SP3 and SP4 Demonstrate Mechanistic Insights of Proteomics Clean-up Techniques.
Conforti JM; Ziegler AM; Worth CS; Nambiar AM; Bailey JT; Taube JH; Gallagher ES
bioRxiv; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38559195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced FASP (eFASP) to increase proteome coverage and sample recovery for quantitative proteomic experiments.
Erde J; Loo RR; Loo JA
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):1885-95. PubMed ID: 24552128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
