138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3046484)
1. Comparative study of cephalexin hydrochloride and cephalexin monohydrate in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.
Kumar A; Murray DL; Hanna CB; Kreindler TG; Jacobson KD; Bundy JM; Waxman K; Finnerty EF; Folan DW; Drucker WR
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Jun; 32(6):882-5. PubMed ID: 3046484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study of use of cefdinir versus cephalexin for treatment of skin infections in pediatric patients. The Cefdinir Pediatric Skin Infection Study Group.
Tack KJ; Keyserling CH; McCarty J; Hedrick JA
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1997 Apr; 41(4):739-42. PubMed ID: 9087480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft tissue infections in the emergency department: the case for the use of 'simple' antibiotics.
Powers RD
South Med J; 1991 Nov; 84(11):1313-5. PubMed ID: 1948213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Double-blind comparison of L-keflex and cephalexin (Keflex) in dental infections (author's transl)].
Horii M; Morinaga T; Shimada S; Takeuchi T; Yamanaka H; Nishimura T; Noshi Y; Okada T; Sasaki T; Ikeda S; Takada S; Iizuka O; Kimura J; Sagara S; Inada Y; Nishioka Y; Kimata M
Jpn J Antibiot; 1980 Nov; 33(11):1194-214. PubMed ID: 7017189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil, cephalexin and cefadroxil in the treatment of patients with primary infections of the skin or skin structures.
Gooch WM; Kaminester L; Cole GW; Binder R; Morman MR; Swinehart JM; Wisniewski M; Yilmaz HM; Collins JJ
Dermatologica; 1991; 183(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 1769413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ofloxacin versus cephalexin in the treatment of skin, skin structure, and soft-tissue infections in adults.
Powers RD; Schwartz R; Snow RM; Yarbrough DR
Clin Ther; 1991; 13(6):727-36. PubMed ID: 1790547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cefadroxil in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.
Ballantyne F
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1982 Sep; 10 Suppl B():143-7. PubMed ID: 6754687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Mallory SB
Am J Med; 1991 Sep; 91(3A):36S-39S. PubMed ID: 1656741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cefdinir versus cephalexin for the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections. The Cefdinir Adult Skin Infection Study Group.
Tack KJ; Littlejohn TW; Mailloux G; Wolf MM; Keyserling CH
Clin Ther; 1998; 20(2):244-56. PubMed ID: 9589816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy and safety of cephradine and cephalexin in children.
Mouallem R
J Int Med Res; 1976; 4(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 799997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ofloxacin versus cephalexin for treating skin and soft tissue infections.
Lipsky BA; Yarbrough DR; Walker FB; Powers RD; Morman MR
Int J Dermatol; 1992 Jun; 31(6):443-5. PubMed ID: 1512105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-blind comparison of cephradine and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections due to Staphylococcus aureus.
Hubsher JA; Gadebusch HH; Itkin AG
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp; 1976 Jun; 19(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 819217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Topical retapamulin ointment (1%, wt/wt) twice daily for 5 days versus oral cephalexin twice daily for 10 days in the treatment of secondarily infected dermatitis: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Parish LC; Jorizzo JL; Breton JJ; Hirman JW; Scangarella NE; Shawar RM; White SM;
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):1003-13. PubMed ID: 17097398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cefdinir vs. cephalexin for mild to moderate uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in adolescents and adults.
Giordano PA; Elston D; Akinlade BK; Weber K; Notario GF; Busman TA; Cifaldi M; Nilius AM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Dec; 22(12):2419-28. PubMed ID: 17257456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind, double-dummy comparison of azithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Kiani R
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991 Oct; 10(10):880-4. PubMed ID: 1662638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of bacterial prostatitis. Comparison of cephalexin and minocycline.
Paulson DF; Zinner NR; Resnick MI; Childs SJ; Love T; Madsen PO
Urology; 1986 Apr; 27(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 3515737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cephalexin: clinical effectiveness in geriatric patients.
Smith IM
Geriatrics; 1977 Mar; 32(3):91-5, 99. PubMed ID: 844692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections: a comparison of cephalexin and dicloxacillin.
Dillon HC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1983 Feb; 8(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 6826814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of cephalexin in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections.
Derrick CW; Reilly K
Postgrad Med J; 1983; 59 Suppl 5():43-6. PubMed ID: 6364089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retapamulin ointment twice daily for 5 days vs oral cephalexin twice daily for 10 days for empiric treatment of secondarily infected traumatic lesions of the skin.
Free A; Roth E; Dalessandro M; Hiram J; Scangarella N; Shawar R; White S;
Skinmed; 2006; 5(5):224-32. PubMed ID: 16957433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
