These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings. Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of prior practice on the stimulus-response compatibility effect in a mixed mapping environment. Creekmur B; Vu KP Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 22953692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Involvement of the primary motor cortex in the early processing stage of the affective stimulus-response compatibility effect in a manikin task. Xia X; Wang D; Song Y; Zhu M; Li Y; Chen R; Zhang J Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117485. PubMed ID: 33132186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance. Vu KP; Proctor RW Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Older and younger adults show comparable affective compatibility and simon effects. Proctor RW; Zhang Y; Vu KP Exp Aging Res; 2013; 39(1):44-69. PubMed ID: 23316736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of mapping complexity on negative priming for incompatible spatial mappings. Read LE; Proctor RW Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1118-23. PubMed ID: 19966265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality. Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of preparatory schema on the speed of responses to spatially compatible and incompatible stimuli. Jennings JR; van der Molen MW; Van der Veen FM; Debski KB Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 12212642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age differences in response selection for pure and mixed stimulus-response mappings and tasks. Vu KP; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18541219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching. Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Being moved: valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions. Krieglmeyer R; Deutsch R; De Houwer J; De Raedt R Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20424109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prepared emotional reflex: intentional preparation of automatic approach and avoidance tendencies as a means to regulate emotional responding. Eder AB; Rothermund K; Proctor RW Emotion; 2010 Aug; 10(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 20677876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of emotional stimulus valence on inhibitory control in adults with and without ADHD. Cavallet M; Chaim-Avancini TM; Biazoli CE; Bazán PR; da Silva MA; Cunha PJ; Miguel CS; Busatto GF; Louzã MR; Gawryszewski LG Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3213-3223. PubMed ID: 27388167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Mattson PS; Fournier LR Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation. Stephan DN; Koch I Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 26377338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]