These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30465269)

  • 21. Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.
    Fintor E; Poljac E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):380-388. PubMed ID: 29926170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modality compatibility in task switching depends on processing codes and task demands.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2346-2363. PubMed ID: 32895726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modality-specific effects of mental fatigue in multitasking.
    Mueckstein M; Heinzel S; Granacher U; Brahms M; Rapp MA; Stelzel C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103766. PubMed ID: 36242924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Working-memory load decreases mappings effects in spatial-compatibility tasks.
    Wühr P
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 21184095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Practice and transfer with mappings of spoon tip and handle to keypress responses.
    Xu Y; Xiong A; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 May; 75(5):892-906. PubMed ID: 34379014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses.
    Song X; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():33-39. PubMed ID: 28823632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response-response compatibility during bimanual movements: evidence for the conceptual coding of action.
    Hazeltine E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 16447382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotions in motion: affective valence can influence compatibility effects with graspable objects.
    Scerrati E; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R; Iani C
    Psychol Res; 2023 Apr; 87(3):725-736. PubMed ID: 35616712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).
    Puffe L; Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184844. PubMed ID: 28910413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance.
    Cross KA; Iacoboni M
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():228-36. PubMed ID: 24473096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Support from a TMS/MEP study for a direct link between positive/negative stimuli and approach/avoidance tendencies.
    Fini C; Fischer M; Bardi L; Brass M; Moors A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jun; 143():107496. PubMed ID: 32407905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anticipatory response control in motor sequence learning: evidence from stimulus-response compatibility.
    Koch I
    Hum Mov Sci; 2007 Apr; 26(2):257-74. PubMed ID: 17346838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance.
    Eder AB; Pfister R; Dignath D; Hommel B
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1211-1224. PubMed ID: 27414187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid emotional words in schizophrenia.
    Sevos J; Grosselin A; Fedotova T; Massoubre C
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 Jul; 241():195-200. PubMed ID: 27179694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2011 Nov; 75(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 21858664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of response selection in sequence learning.
    Deroost N; Soetens E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 16627348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.