BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30465547)

  • 1. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral imaging: fresh and fixed normal and malignant tissue.
    Fredenberg E; Willsher P; Moa E; Dance DR; Young KC; Wallis MG
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235003. PubMed ID: 30465547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: solid lesions.
    Fredenberg E; Kilburn-Toppin F; Willsher P; Moa E; Danielsson M; Dance DR; Young KC; Wallis MG
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Apr; 61(7):2595-612. PubMed ID: 26961507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: first results on cyst fluid.
    Fredenberg E; Dance DR; Willsher P; Moa E; von Tiedemann M; Young KC; Wallis MG
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(24):8609-20. PubMed ID: 24254377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo measurement of the effective atomic number of breast skin using spectral mammography.
    Berggren K; Eriksson M; Hall P; Wallis MG; Fredenberg E
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215023. PubMed ID: 30375362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast-density measurement using photon-counting spectral mammography.
    Johansson H; von Tiedemann M; Erhard K; Heese H; Ding H; Molloi S; Fredenberg E
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3579-3593. PubMed ID: 28421611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
    Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of Cystic Lesions by Spectral Mammography: Results of a Clinical Pilot Study.
    Erhard K; Kilburn-Toppin F; Willsher P; Moa E; Fredenberg E; Wieberneit N; Buelow T; Wallis MG
    Invest Radiol; 2016 May; 51(5):340-7. PubMed ID: 26741891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues.
    Johns PC; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jun; 32(6):675-95. PubMed ID: 3039542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
    Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
    Windt DL
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
    Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of breast microcalcifications with GaAs photon-counting spectral mammography using an inverse problem approach.
    Ghammraoui B; Bader S; Thuering T; Glick SJ
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36716475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials.
    Byng JW; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 May; 43(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 9623665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.