These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30465547)

  • 21. X-ray scattering from human breast tissues and breast-equivalent materials.
    Poletti ME; Gonçalves D; Mazzaro I
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jan; 47(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 11814227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating the feasibility of classifying breast microcalcifications using photon-counting spectral mammography: A simulation study.
    Ghammraoui B; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2304-2311. PubMed ID: 28332199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.
    Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):515-23. PubMed ID: 20505033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Compositional breast imaging using a dual-energy mammography protocol.
    Laidevant AD; Malkov S; Flowers CI; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):164-74. PubMed ID: 20175478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calibration phantoms for accurate water and lipid density quantification using dual energy mammography.
    Cho HM; Ding H; Kumar N; Sennung D; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):4589-4603. PubMed ID: 28440226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results.
    Pani S; Longo R; Dreossi D; Montanari F; Olivo A; Arfelli F; Bergamaschi A; Poropat P; Rigon L; Zanconati F; Dalla Palma L; Castelli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(9):1739-54. PubMed ID: 15152928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attenuation of monochromatic X-rays by normal and abnormal breast tissues.
    Carroll FE; Waters JW; Andrews WW; Price RR; Pickens DR; Willcott R; Tompkins P; Roos C; Page D; Reed G
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Mar; 29(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 8175299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using convolutional neural networks to discriminate between cysts and masses in Monte Carlo-simulated dual-energy mammography.
    Makeev A; Toner B; Qian M; Badal A; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4648-4655. PubMed ID: 34050965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. INDIVIDUALISED CALCULATION OF TISSUE IMPARTED ENERGY IN BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS.
    Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):267-73. PubMed ID: 27127209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
    Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dedicated Breast Computed Tomography With a Photon-Counting Detector: Initial Results of Clinical In Vivo Imaging.
    Berger N; Marcon M; Saltybaeva N; Kalender WA; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Jul; 54(7):409-418. PubMed ID: 30829942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    Crotty DJ; McKinley RL; Tornai MP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):603-16. PubMed ID: 17228108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of mammography radiation dose values obtained from direct incident air kerma measurements with values from measured X-ray spectral data.
    Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Apr; 62(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 15701409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
    Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative characterization of breast tissues with dedicated CT imaging.
    Piai A; Contillo A; Arfelli F; Bonazza D; Brombal L; Assunta Cova M; Delogu P; Di Trapani V; Donato S; Golosio B; Mettivier G; Oliva P; Rigon L; Taibi A; Tonutti M; Tromba G; Zanconati F; Longo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(15):155011. PubMed ID: 31234148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantification of breast density using dual-energy mammography with liquid phantom calibration.
    Lam AR; Ding H; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3985-4000. PubMed ID: 24971873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.