These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30465547)

  • 41. Quantitative characterization of breast tissues with dedicated CT imaging.
    Piai A; Contillo A; Arfelli F; Bonazza D; Brombal L; Assunta Cova M; Delogu P; Di Trapani V; Donato S; Golosio B; Mettivier G; Oliva P; Rigon L; Taibi A; Tonutti M; Tromba G; Zanconati F; Longo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(15):155011. PubMed ID: 31234148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Quantification of breast density using dual-energy mammography with liquid phantom calibration.
    Lam AR; Ding H; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3985-4000. PubMed ID: 24971873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
    Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantification of breast lesion compositions using low-dose spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
    Ding H; Sennung D; Cho HM; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5527. PubMed ID: 27782705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Breast dosimetry in alternative X-ray-based imaging modalities used in current clinical practices.
    Di Maria S; Vedantham S; Vaz P
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Oct; 155():110509. PubMed ID: 36087425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. 3D phantom for image quality assessment of mammography systems.
    Bermúdez J; Roque G; Calderón J; Pardo P; Sánchez M; Ramos V; Ávila C
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37733054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.
    Kalender WA; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Lück F; Rößler AC; Wenkel E
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1081-1086. PubMed ID: 27306559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Technical challenges in generalizing calibration techniques for breast density measurements.
    Fowler EEE; Smallwood AM; Khan NZ; Kilpatrick K; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):679-688. PubMed ID: 30525207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of spectra and mean glandular dose (MGD) with tube voltage used in digital mammography for simulated, metrological and clinical cases.
    Barbosa da Silveira Gatto L; Braz D; Pacifico L; Travassos PC; Goncalves Magalhaes LA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2021 Oct; 176():109862. PubMed ID: 34385091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis.
    Caballo M; Rabin C; Fedon C; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Diaz O; Boone JM; Dance DR; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5423-5438. PubMed ID: 35635844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography.
    Fahrig R; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1994 Sep; 21(9):1463-71. PubMed ID: 7838058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of screening performance metrics and patient dose of two mammographic image acquisition modes in the Danish National Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
    Abdi AJ; Fieselmann A; Pfaff H; Mertelmeier T; Larsen LB
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():188-194. PubMed ID: 30017278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Volumetric lean percentage measurement using dual energy mammography.
    Ducote JL; Klopfer MJ; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4498-504. PubMed ID: 21928619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.