158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30465637)
1. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes.
Mewes A; Brademann G; Hey M
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e934-e944. PubMed ID: 32658111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
Cuda D; Murri A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK.
Gomez Serrano M; Patel S; Harris R; Selvadurai D
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):207-216. PubMed ID: 30947632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrode Translocations in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes: Audiological and Electrophysiological Outcome.
Liebscher T; Mewes A; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Brademann G; Hey M
Z Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 31(3):265-275. PubMed ID: 32620321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiological Outcomes and Map Characteristics in Children With Perimodiolar and Slim Straight Array Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears.
Park LR; Teagle HFB; Brown KD; Gagnon EB; Woodard JS; Buchman CA
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e320-e326. PubMed ID: 28902802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation.
Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Gifford RH; Haynes DS; Roberts JB; Gilbane MS; Murfee J; Bennett ML
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(10):918-926. PubMed ID: 31274070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Proximity to the Modiolus for the Cochlear CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode Array on Evoked Compound Action Potentials and Programming Levels.
Greisiger R; Heldahl MG; Myhrum M; Sørensen TM; Dammerud JJ; Rasmussen K; Korslund H; Bunne M; Jablonski GE
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 35504247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.
Chen JK; Chuang AY; Sprinzl GM; Tung TH; Li LP
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71929. PubMed ID: 23991008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant.
Hey M; Neben N; Stöver T; Baumann U; Mewes A; Liebscher T; Schüssler M; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T; Büchner A; Greenham P; Hoppe U
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Jun; 277(6):1625-1635. PubMed ID: 32140773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
