181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30466054)
1. The effect of varying the number of contributors in the prosecution and alternate propositions.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Cheng K; Kelly H; Taylor DA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():225-231. PubMed ID: 30466054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The a posteriori probability of the number of contributors when conditioned on an assumed contributor.
Grgicak CM; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102563. PubMed ID: 34284325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inclusion probability with dropout: an operational formula.
Milot E; Courteau J; Crispino F; Mailly F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():71-76. PubMed ID: 25559642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation and validation of an improved allele specific stutter filtering method for electropherogram interpretation.
Kalafut T; Schuerman C; Sutton J; Faris T; Armogida L; Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():50-56. PubMed ID: 29660688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
Taylor D; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
