These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30466658)

  • 1. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
    Yang Q; Xian H; Cheng X; Wu X; Meng J; Chen W; Zeng Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 39107813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?
    van der Pol CB; McInnes MD; Petrcich W; Tunis AS; Hanna R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119892. PubMed ID: 25775455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
    Rainkie DC; Abedini ZS; Abdelkader NN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243091. PubMed ID: 33326429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
    Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
    Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview.
    Martins DE; Astur N; Kanas M; Ferretti M; Lenza M; Wajchenberg M
    Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 26826347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).
    Shea BJ; Bouter LM; Peterson J; Boers M; Andersson N; Ortiz Z; Ramsay T; Bai A; Shukla VK; Grimshaw JM
    PLoS One; 2007 Dec; 2(12):e1350. PubMed ID: 18159233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Sultan OS; Jayaraman J; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):903-913. PubMed ID: 29602531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012867. PubMed ID: 27864250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.