360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30466699)
1. Synthetic Midurethral Slings: Roles, Outcomes, and Complications.
Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 30466699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serious complications and recurrences after retropubic vs transobturator midurethral sling procedures for 2682 patients in the VIGI-MESH register.
Armengaud C; Fauconnier A; Drioueche H; Campagne Loiseau S; De Tayrac R; Saussine C; Panel L; Cosson M; Deffieux X; Lucot JP; Pizzoferrato AC; Ferry P; Vidart A; Thubert T; Capon G; Debodinance P; Gauthier T; Koebele A; Salet-Lizee D; Hermieu JF; Game X; Ramanah R; Lamblin G; Lecornet E; Carlier-Guérin C; Chartier-Kastler E; Fritel X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 230(4):428.e1-428.e13. PubMed ID: 38008151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term Rate of Mesh Sling Removal Following Midurethral Mesh Sling Insertion Among Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Gurol-Urganci I; Geary RS; Mamza JB; Duckett J; El-Hamamsy D; Dolan L; Tincello DG; van der Meulen J
JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(16):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 30357298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective study of a single-incision sling versus a transobturator sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 3-year results.
White AB; Kahn BS; Gonzalez RR; Rosamilia A; Anger JT; Eilber KS; Schaffer JI
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):545.e1-545.e11. PubMed ID: 32184149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Salvage autologous fascial sling after failed synthetic midurethral sling: Greater than 3-year outcomes.
Petrou SP; Davidiuk AJ; Rawal B; Arnold M; Thiel DD
Int J Urol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 26563492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.
Laurikainen E; Valpas A; Aukee P; Kivelä A; Rinne K; Takala T; Nilsson CG
Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1109-14. PubMed ID: 24508070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More With Less: Single-Incision Sling Insertion Techniques.
Wheat JE; Welch EK; Heuer CW; Dengler KL; Gruber DD; von Pechmann WS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):364. PubMed ID: 38307223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches.
Caldwell L; White AB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2021 Sep; 48(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 34416931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removal of transobturator midurethral sling for refractory thigh pain.
Wolter CE; Starkman JS; Scarpero HM; Dmochowski RR
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):461.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18314169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Erickson T; Roovers JP; Gheiler E; Parekh M; Parva M; Hanson C; McCrery R; Tu LM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 32320798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Schimpf MO; Rahn DD; Wheeler TL; Patel M; White AB; Orejuela FJ; El-Nashar SA; Margulies RU; Gleason JL; Aschkenazi SO; Mamik MM; Ward RM; Balk EM; Sung VW;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):71.e1-71.e27. PubMed ID: 24487005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical Pain After Transobturator and Retropubic Midurethral Sling Placement.
Thomas TN; Siff LN; Jelovsek JE; Barber M
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 28594776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cystourethroscopy following midurethral slings: is it always necessary?
Melon J; Kelly EC; van Delft KWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):789-793. PubMed ID: 29564509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of "unilateral midurethral sling cut down" in women with voiding dysfunctions after anti-incontinence surgery.
Ngo YG; Huang KH; Kung FT; Wu LY; Chu LC; Yang TH; Chuang FC
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Sep; 51(9):1501-1506. PubMed ID: 31270741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of the results of urinary incontinence treatment in women using free suburethral synthetic sling: the experience of 1000 operations].
Kasian GR; Gvozdev MIu; Godunov BN; Prokopovich MA; Pushkar' DIu
Urologiia; 2013; (4):5-11. PubMed ID: 24159756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]