505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30467702)
1. The value of a 1-day multidisciplinary robot surgery training for novice robot surgeons.
Beulens AJW; Brinkman WM; Porte PJ; Meijer RP; van Merriënboer JJG; Van der Poel HG; Wagner C
J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):435-447. PubMed ID: 30467702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Training novice robot surgeons: Proctoring provides same results as simulator-generated guidance.
Beulens AJW; Hashish YAF; Brinkman WM; Umari P; Puliatti S; Koldewijn EL; Hendrikx AJM; van Basten JP; van Merriënboer JJG; Van der Poel HG; Bangma CH; Wagner C
J Robot Surg; 2021 Jun; 15(3):397-428. PubMed ID: 32651769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity assessment of a simulation module for robot-assisted thoracic lobectomy.
Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raveendran S; Dar F; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jan; 27(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30417680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Competency based training in robotic surgery: benchmark scores for virtual reality robotic simulation.
Raison N; Ahmed K; Fossati N; Buffi N; Mottrie A; Dasgupta P; Van Der Poel H
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):804-811. PubMed ID: 27862825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.
Hovgaard LH; Andersen SAW; Konge L; Dalsgaard T; Larsen CR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Oct; 32(10):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 29603003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
Brinkman W; de Angst I; Schreuder H; Schout B; Draaisma W; Verweij L; Hendrikx A; van der Poel H
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):281-287. PubMed ID: 27194262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.
Lee GI; Lee MR
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 28634632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic simulation training for urological trainees: a comprehensive review on cost, merits and challenges.
MacCraith E; Forde JC; Davis NF
J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 30796671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Training benchmarks based on validated composite scores for the RobotiX robot-assisted surgery simulator on basic tasks.
Leijte E; Claassen L; Arts E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 32314094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Examining validity evidence for a simulation-based assessment tool for basic robotic surgical skills.
Havemann MC; Dalsgaard T; Sørensen JL; Røssaak K; Brisling S; Mosgaard BJ; Høgdall C; Bjerrum F
J Robot Surg; 2019 Feb; 13(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 29761352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An intensive vascular surgical skills and simulation course for vascular trainees improves procedural knowledge and self-rated procedural competence.
Robinson WP; Doucet DR; Simons JP; Wyman A; Aiello FA; Arous E; Schanzer A; Messina LM
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(3):907-915.e3. PubMed ID: 28236930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training.
Azadi S; Green IC; Arnold A; Truong M; Potts J; Martino MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):490-495. PubMed ID: 33310145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?
Mills JT; Hougen HY; Bitner D; Krupski TL; Schenkman NS
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1052-1056. PubMed ID: 28623113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive Validation of a Robotic Virtual Reality Simulator: The Tube 3 module for Practicing Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Shim JS; Noh TI; Kim JY; Pyun JH; Cho S; Oh MM; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kim JJ; Kang SG
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():32-36. PubMed ID: 30144481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving Robotic Skills by Video Review.
van der Leun JA; Siem G; Meijer RP; Brinkman WM
J Endourol; 2022 Aug; 36(8):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 35262417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study.
Moglia A; Sinceri S; Ferrari V; Ferrari M; Mosca F; Morelli L
Updates Surg; 2018 Sep; 70(3):401-405. PubMed ID: 29987767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.
Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V
J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Validation of a Novel Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Virtual Reality Module.
Harrison P; Raison N; Abe T; Watkinson W; Dar F; Challacombe B; Van Der Poel H; Khan MS; Dasgupa P; Ahmed K
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):758-766. PubMed ID: 28974429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
