These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Random reduction in fingerprint bit density improves compound recall in search calculations using complex reference molecules. Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jun; 71(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 18466274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do 2D fingerprints detect structurally diverse active compounds? Revealing compound subset-specific fingerprint features through systematic selection. Heikamp K; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2254-65. PubMed ID: 21793563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints. Vogt M; Bajorath J ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereoselective virtual screening of the ZINC database using atom pair 3D-fingerprints. Awale M; Jin X; Reymond JL J Cheminform; 2015; 7():3. PubMed ID: 25750664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. Schuffenhauer A; Floersheim P; Acklin P; Jacoby E J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):391-405. PubMed ID: 12653501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a fingerprint reduction approach for Bayesian similarity searching based on Kullback-Leibler divergence analysis. Nisius B; Vogt M; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1347-58. PubMed ID: 19480403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomy of fingerprint search calculations on structurally diverse sets of active compounds. Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1812-9. PubMed ID: 16309288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarity searching for potent compounds using feature selection. Vogt M; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1613-9. PubMed ID: 23808911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relevance of feature combinations for similarity searching using general or activity class-directed molecular fingerprints. Lounkine E; Hu Y; Batista J; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):561-70. PubMed ID: 19434896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping. Škuta C; Cortés-Ciriano I; Dehaen W; Kříž P; van Westen GJP; Tetko IV; Bender A; Svozil D J Cheminform; 2020 May; 12(1):39. PubMed ID: 33431038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of Natural Compound Molecular Fingerprint (NC-MFP) with the Dictionary of Natural Products (DNP) for natural product-based drug development. Seo M; Shin HK; Myung Y; Hwang S; No KT J Cheminform; 2020 Jan; 12(1):6. PubMed ID: 33431009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the performance of fingerprint similarity searching. Vogt M; Bajorath J Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 672():159-73. PubMed ID: 20838968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction and recombination of fingerprints of different design increase compound recall and the structural diversity of hits. Nisius B; Bajorath J Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Feb; 75(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 20028390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]