These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30467746)

  • 1. The impact of livestock farming activity on the quality of surface water.
    Cesoniene L; Dapkiene M; Sileikiene D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(32):32678-32686. PubMed ID: 30467746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion pollution from livestock and poultry rearing in the Yangtze Delta, China.
    Gu P; Shen RF; Chen YD
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 18504847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of effluent from different livestock farm types (pig, cow, and poultry) on surrounding water quality: a comprehensive assessment using individual parameter evaluation method and water quality indices.
    Cao ST; Tran HP; Le HTT; Bui HPK; Nguyen GTH; Nguyen LT; Nguyen BT; Luong AD
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(36):50302-50315. PubMed ID: 33959840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of water quality concerns in livestock farming areas.
    Hooda PS; Edwards AC; Anderson HA; Miller A
    Sci Total Environ; 2000 Apr; 250(1-3):143-67. PubMed ID: 10811258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Livestock and Poultry Faeces Nitrogen Loading Rate and Its Potential Return to Farmland in China].
    Liu XY; Wang XB; Li ST
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Dec; 39(12):5723-5739. PubMed ID: 30628420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pollution from animal husbandry in China: a case study of the Han River Basin.
    Sun C; Wu H
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):872-8. PubMed ID: 22766880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital technology adoption in livestock production with a special focus on ruminant farming.
    Groher T; Heitkämper K; Umstätter C
    Animal; 2020 Nov; 14(11):2404-2413. PubMed ID: 32613933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Occurrence of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli in Livestock and Farm Workers in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany.
    Dahms C; Hübner NO; Kossow A; Mellmann A; Dittmann K; Kramer A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143326. PubMed ID: 26606146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of potato cultivation and cattle farming on physicochemical parameters and enzymatic activities of Neotropical high Andean Páramo ecosystem soils.
    Avellaneda-Torres LM; León Sicard TE; Torres Rojas E
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 631-632():1600-1610. PubMed ID: 29727984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort profile: The FarmMERGE project-Merging human and animal databases to investigate the relationship between farmer and livestock health and welfare. The HUNT Study.
    Torske MO; Steen N; Ursin JT; Krokstad S; Nørstebø H; Muri K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0301045. PubMed ID: 38547183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pollutants from livestock and poultry farming in China-geographic distribution and drivers.
    Gan L; Hu X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 May; 23(9):8470-83. PubMed ID: 26782328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Livestock and livelihoods of smallholder cattle-owning households in Cambodia: the contribution of on-farm and off-farm activities to income and food security.
    Ashley K; Harrison H; Chan PH; Sothoeun S; Young JR; Windsor PA; Bush RD
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2018 Dec; 50(8):1747-1761. PubMed ID: 29796792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems.
    Aquilani C; Confessore A; Bozzi R; Sirtori F; Pugliese C
    Animal; 2022 Jan; 16(1):100429. PubMed ID: 34953277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can we compare multispecies livestock rearing households? - an analysis of the impact of health and production parameters on multispecies livestock rearing outcomes.
    Win TTZ; Campbell A; Soares Magalhaes RJ; Oo KN; Henning J
    BMC Vet Res; 2022 Apr; 18(1):158. PubMed ID: 35488335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Livestock management and veterinary services for cattle and pigs in Switzerland].
    Hool N; Schüpbach-Regula G; Thomann B
    Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd; 2020 May; 162(5):293-306. PubMed ID: 32369022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unravelling the physical, technological and economic factors driving the intensification trajectories of livestock systems.
    Domingues JP; Ryschawy J; Bonaudo T; Gabrielle B; Tichit M
    Animal; 2018 Aug; 12(8):1652-1661. PubMed ID: 29198219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental assessment of livestock farms in the context of BAT system introduction in Russia.
    Briukhanov A; Vasilev E; Kozlova N; Shalavina E; Subbotin I; Lukin S
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():283-288. PubMed ID: 31181477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus flows in livestock production in Dianchi Lake basin, China.
    Anzai H; Wang L; Oishi K; Irbis C; Li K; Kumagai H; Inamura T; Hirooka H
    Anim Sci J; 2016 Jan; 87(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 25997512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Animal management to reduce phosphorus losses to the environment.
    Knowlton KF; Radcliffe JS; Novak CL; Emmerson DA
    J Anim Sci; 2004; 82 E-Suppl():E173-195. PubMed ID: 15471797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.