BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30467778)

  • 1. Cone beam versus multi-detector computed tomography for detecting hearing loss.
    Debeaupte M; Hermann R; Pialat JB; Martinon A; Truy E; Ltaief Boudrigua A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Feb; 276(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 30467778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cone-Beam CT Compared to Multi-Slice CT for the Diagnostic Analysis of Conductive Hearing Loss: A Feasibility Study.
    Kemp P; Stralen JV; De Graaf P; Berkhout E; Horssen PV; Merkus P
    J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Aug; 16(2):222-226. PubMed ID: 32784161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: A comparative study on Phantom and cadaver head scans.
    Veldhoen S; Schöllchen M; Hanken H; Precht C; Henes FO; Schön G; Nagel HD; Schumacher U; Heiland M; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):790-800. PubMed ID: 27169574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Visualization of subtle temporal bone structures. Comparison of cone beam CT and MDCT].
    Pein MK; Brandt S; Plontke SK; Kösling S
    Radiologe; 2014 Mar; 54(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 24463714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visualisation of passive middle ear implants by cone beam and multi-detector computed tomography: a comparative in vitro study.
    Nguyen TD; Kösling S; Mlynski R; Plontke SK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4538-4544. PubMed ID: 27027315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of image quality in soft tissue and bone visualization tasks for a dedicated extremity cone-beam CT system.
    Demehri S; Muhit A; Zbijewski W; Stayman JW; Yorkston J; Packard N; Senn R; Yang D; Foos D; Thawait GK; Fayad LM; Chhabra A; Carrino JA; Siewerdsen JH
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1742-51. PubMed ID: 25599933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiohistologic Comparison Study of Temporal Bone Specimens After Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Is Cone-Beam CT Superior to MDCT?
    Burck I; Schneider SV; Balster S; Lehn A; Yel I; Albrecht MH; Helbig S; Stöver T; Kaltenbach B; Vogl TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):752-758. PubMed ID: 33439050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using cone-beam CT as a low-dose 3D imaging technique for the extremities: initial experience in 50 subjects.
    Huang AJ; Chang CY; Thomas BJ; MacMahon PJ; Palmer WE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Jun; 44(6):797-809. PubMed ID: 25652734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography in temporal bone imaging for surgical treatment.
    Erovic BM; Chan HH; Daly MJ; Pothier DD; Yu E; Coulson C; Lai P; Irish JC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jan; 150(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 24170658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma.
    Tschauner S; Marterer R; Nagy E; Singer G; Riccabona M; Sorantin E
    Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(12):1939-1949. PubMed ID: 32535775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
    Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study of accuracy of detection of surface osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint using multidetector CT and cone beam CT.
    Zain-Alabdeen EH; Alsadhan RI
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 22378752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The advantages of cone-beam computerised tomography (CT) in pain management following total knee arthroplasty, in comparison with conventional multi-detector CT.
    Dartus J; Jacques T; Martinot P; Pasquier G; Cotten A; Migaud H; Morel V; Putman S
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102874. PubMed ID: 33647454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Radiation Dose from Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Multidetector Computed Tomography in Examinations of the Hand.
    Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Gerstmair A; Krauss T; Reising K; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Voigt J
    Rofo; 2016 May; 188(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 26981913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam CT paranasal sinuses versus standard multidetector and low dose multidetector CT studies.
    Al Abduwani J; ZilinSkiene L; Colley S; Ahmed S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 26700263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Otosclerosis: anatomy and pathology in the temporal bone assessed by multi-slice and cone-beam CT.
    Redfors YD; Gröndahl HG; Hellgren J; Lindfors N; Nilsson I; Möller C
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 22771999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D cone-beam CT with a twin robotic x-ray system in elbow imaging: comparison of image quality to high-resolution multidetector CT.
    Grunz JP; Weng AM; Kunz AS; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Schmitt R; Gietzen CH; Pennig L; Herz S; Ergün S; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):52. PubMed ID: 32895778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography.
    Dahmani-Causse M; Marx M; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Lepage B; Escudé B
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2011 Nov; 128(5):230-5. PubMed ID: 22014530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography versus multi-detector computed tomography for sinonasal structure evaluation.
    Han M; Kim HJ; Choi JW; Park DY; Han JG
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 7(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 35734052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.