These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns. Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Arola D; Øilo M Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 33910755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar. Øilo M; Kvam K; Gjerdet NR J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 26775244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour. Larsson C Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey. Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Cervical Collar Removal on the Fracture Load of Anterior Zirconia Crowns. Campos F; Cardoso M; de Melo RM; Bottino MA; Souza RO Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2017; 37(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 28196165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of zirconia coping designs on the fracture load of all-ceramic molar crowns. Kokubo Y; Tsumita M; Kano T; Fukushima S Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 21597222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Margin Designs on Crack Initiation of High Translucency Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Juntavee N; Juntavee A; Kornrum S J Prosthodont; 2021 Jul; 30(6):490-499. PubMed ID: 33009879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]