These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30468259)

  • 1. Effect size, statistical power, and sample size for assessing interactions between categorical and continuous variables.
    Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):136-154. PubMed ID: 30468259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size calculations for comparison of two regression lines with heterogeneous variances.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0207745. PubMed ID: 30557387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA.
    Shieh G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28121163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the weighted eta-squared effect sizes in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 22806705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size determination for confidence intervals of interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous predictor and moderator variables.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 20805605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A flexible approach to identify interaction effects between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):134-152. PubMed ID: 30511514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination for examining interaction effects in factorial designs under variance heterogeneity.
    Shieh G
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 28493739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On tests of treatment-covariate interactions: An illustration of appropriate power and sample size calculations.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177682. PubMed ID: 28545117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
    Bom PRD; Rachinger H
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A note on power and sample size calculations for the Kruskal-Wallis test for ordered categorical data.
    Fan C; Zhang D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1162-73. PubMed ID: 23075015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probing categorical moderation under variance heterogeneity.
    Shieh G
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Jun; 26(3):315-326. PubMed ID: 32914998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Confidence Interval for the Difference Between Standardized Regression Coefficients.
    Anderson SF
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(4):758-780. PubMed ID: 38560991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size estimation for pilot animal experiments by using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach.
    Allgoewer A; Mayer B
    Altern Lab Anim; 2017 May; 45(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 28598193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Two-level Moderated Latent Variable Model with Single Level Data.
    Liu H; Yuan KH; Liu F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):873-893. PubMed ID: 31782662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
    Mütze T; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
    Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculations for model validation in linear regression analysis.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 30866825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.