332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30469686)
1. Proof-of-principle demonstration of parametric down-conversion source-based quantum key distribution over 40 dB channel loss.
Zhang CH; Wang D; Zhou XY; Wang S; Zhang LB; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Han ZF; Guo GC; Wang Q
Opt Express; 2018 Oct; 26(20):25921-25933. PubMed ID: 30469686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proof-of-Principle Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution.
Hu C; Wang W; Chan KS; Yuan Z; Lo HK
Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Sep; 131(11):110801. PubMed ID: 37774309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite-key security analyses on passive decoy-state QKD protocols with different unstable sources.
Song TT; Qin SJ; Wen QY; Wang YK; Jia HY
Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15276. PubMed ID: 26471947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Security of the Decoy-State BB84 Protocol with Imperfect State Preparation.
Reutov A; Tayduganov A; Mayboroda V; Fat'yanov O
Entropy (Basel); 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37998248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental decoy-state quantum key distribution with a sub-poissionian heralded single-photon source.
Wang Q; Chen W; Xavier G; Swillo M; Zhang T; Sauge S; Tengner M; Han ZF; Guo GC; Karlsson A
Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(9):090501. PubMed ID: 18352685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Security analysis of quantum key distribution on passive optical networks.
Lim K; Ko H; Suh C; Rhee JK
Opt Express; 2017 May; 25(10):11894-11909. PubMed ID: 28788747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with modified coherent state.
Li M; Zhang CM; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Wang S; Guo GC; Han ZF
Opt Lett; 2014 Feb; 39(4):880-3. PubMed ID: 24562231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with a passive decoy state method.
Liu L; Guo FZ; Qin SJ; Wen QY
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42261. PubMed ID: 28198808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution.
Roberts GL; Pittaluga M; Minder M; Lucamarini M; Dynes JF; Yuan ZL; Shields AJ
Opt Lett; 2018 Oct; 43(20):5110-5113. PubMed ID: 30320832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hacking on decoy-state quantum key distribution system with partial phase randomization.
Sun SH; Jiang MS; Ma XC; Li CY; Liang LM
Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4759. PubMed ID: 24755767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Plug-and-play round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
Mao QP; Wang L; Zhao SM
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15435. PubMed ID: 29133835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optically injected intensity-stable pulse source for secure quantum key distribution.
Xie HB; Li Y; Jiang C; Cai WQ; Yin J; Ren JG; Wang XB; Liao SK; Peng CZ
Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):12231-12240. PubMed ID: 31052767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental underwater quantum key distribution.
Feng Z; Li S; Xu Z
Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 29(6):8725-8736. PubMed ID: 33820314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantum man-in-the-middle attack on the calibration process of quantum key distribution.
Fei YY; Meng XD; Gao M; Wang H; Ma Z
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4283. PubMed ID: 29523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biased three-intensity decoy-state scheme on the measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using heralded single-photon sources.
Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Guo GC; Wang Q
Opt Express; 2018 Feb; 26(4):4219-4229. PubMed ID: 29475274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phase-Reference-Free Experiment of Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution.
Wang C; Song XT; Yin ZQ; Wang S; Chen W; Zhang CM; Guo GC; Han ZF
Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Oct; 115(16):160502. PubMed ID: 26550855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple and efficient quantum key distribution with parametric down-conversion.
Adachi Y; Yamamoto T; Koashi M; Imoto N
Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Nov; 99(18):180503. PubMed ID: 17995389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with four-intensity decoy-state method.
Mao CC; Zhou XY; Zhu JR; Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Wang Q
Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):13289-13300. PubMed ID: 29801354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
