These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30469686)

  • 1. Proof-of-principle demonstration of parametric down-conversion source-based quantum key distribution over 40 dB channel loss.
    Zhang CH; Wang D; Zhou XY; Wang S; Zhang LB; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Han ZF; Guo GC; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 Oct; 26(20):25921-25933. PubMed ID: 30469686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proof-of-Principle Demonstration of Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution.
    Hu C; Wang W; Chan KS; Yuan Z; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Sep; 131(11):110801. PubMed ID: 37774309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite-key security analyses on passive decoy-state QKD protocols with different unstable sources.
    Song TT; Qin SJ; Wen QY; Wang YK; Jia HY
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15276. PubMed ID: 26471947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Security of the Decoy-State BB84 Protocol with Imperfect State Preparation.
    Reutov A; Tayduganov A; Mayboroda V; Fat'yanov O
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37998248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental decoy-state quantum key distribution with a sub-poissionian heralded single-photon source.
    Wang Q; Chen W; Xavier G; Swillo M; Zhang T; Sauge S; Tengner M; Han ZF; Guo GC; Karlsson A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Mar; 100(9):090501. PubMed ID: 18352685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Security analysis of quantum key distribution on passive optical networks.
    Lim K; Ko H; Suh C; Rhee JK
    Opt Express; 2017 May; 25(10):11894-11909. PubMed ID: 28788747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with modified coherent state.
    Li M; Zhang CM; Yin ZQ; Chen W; Wang S; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Lett; 2014 Feb; 39(4):880-3. PubMed ID: 24562231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Round-robin differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with a passive decoy state method.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Qin SJ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42261. PubMed ID: 28198808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution.
    Roberts GL; Pittaluga M; Minder M; Lucamarini M; Dynes JF; Yuan ZL; Shields AJ
    Opt Lett; 2018 Oct; 43(20):5110-5113. PubMed ID: 30320832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sending-or-Not-Sending Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution with a Passive Decoy-State Method.
    Xue K; Shen Z; Zhao S; Mao Q
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 May; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 35626547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hacking on decoy-state quantum key distribution system with partial phase randomization.
    Sun SH; Jiang MS; Ma XC; Li CY; Liang LM
    Sci Rep; 2014 Apr; 4():4759. PubMed ID: 24755767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plug-and-play round-robin differential phase-shift quantum key distribution.
    Mao QP; Wang L; Zhao SM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15435. PubMed ID: 29133835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optically injected intensity-stable pulse source for secure quantum key distribution.
    Xie HB; Li Y; Jiang C; Cai WQ; Yin J; Ren JG; Wang XB; Liao SK; Peng CZ
    Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):12231-12240. PubMed ID: 31052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental underwater quantum key distribution.
    Feng Z; Li S; Xu Z
    Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 29(6):8725-8736. PubMed ID: 33820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantum man-in-the-middle attack on the calibration process of quantum key distribution.
    Fei YY; Meng XD; Gao M; Wang H; Ma Z
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4283. PubMed ID: 29523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biased three-intensity decoy-state scheme on the measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using heralded single-photon sources.
    Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Guo GC; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 Feb; 26(4):4219-4229. PubMed ID: 29475274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phase-Reference-Free Experiment of Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution.
    Wang C; Song XT; Yin ZQ; Wang S; Chen W; Zhang CM; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Oct; 115(16):160502. PubMed ID: 26550855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple and efficient quantum key distribution with parametric down-conversion.
    Adachi Y; Yamamoto T; Koashi M; Imoto N
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Nov; 99(18):180503. PubMed ID: 17995389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with four-intensity decoy-state method.
    Mao CC; Zhou XY; Zhu JR; Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):13289-13300. PubMed ID: 29801354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.