These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

635 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30470579)

  • 1. Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.
    Zhang L; Lin Z; Yin H; Liu J; Xuan J
    Clin Ther; 2018 Dec; 40(12):2125-2137. PubMed ID: 30470579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 30-month vs 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin after drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Jiang M; You JHS
    Clin Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 40(10):789-796. PubMed ID: 28683175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST-segment elevation in Greece: a cost-utility analysis.
    Kourlaba G; Fragoulakis V; Maniadakis N
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2012 Jul; 10(4):261-71. PubMed ID: 22667992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes based on the PLATO trial: a Singapore healthcare perspective.
    Chin CT; Mellstrom C; Chua TS; Matchar DB
    Singapore Med J; 2013 Mar; 54(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 23546032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clopidogrel for Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in China.
    Cui M; Tu CC; Chen EZ; Wang XL; Tan SC; Chen C
    Adv Ther; 2016 Sep; 33(9):1600-11. PubMed ID: 27397588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Comprehensive MTM Integrated with Point-of-Care Phenotypic and Genetic Testing for U.S. Elderly Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Okere AN; Ezendu K; Berthe A; Diaby V
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Feb; 24(2):142-152. PubMed ID: 29384027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effective analysis of clopidogrel versus aspirin for high risk patients with established peripheral arterial disease in China.
    Lin Z; Zhang L; Yang X; Liu L; Xuan J
    J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):659-666. PubMed ID: 31999196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.
    Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Dwan K; Beale S; Fleeman N; McEntee J; Dundar Y; Richardson M; Fisher M
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Apr; 19(29):1-130. PubMed ID: 25896573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness of acute coronary syndrome secondary prevention with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel: economic evaluation from the public payer's perspective in Poland based on the PLATO trial results.
    Pawęska J; Macioch T; Perkowski P; Budaj A; Niewada M
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 24846362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of
    Fu Y; Zhang XY; Qin SB; Nie XY; Shi LW; Shao H; Liu J
    Pharmacogenomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 31849282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The STOPDAPT-2 ACS Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Watanabe H; Morimoto T; Natsuaki M; Yamamoto K; Obayashi Y; Ogita M; Suwa S; Isawa T; Domei T; Yamaji K; Tatsushima S; Watanabe H; Ohya M; Tokuyama H; Tada T; Sakamoto H; Mori H; Suzuki H; Nishikura T; Wakabayashi K; Hibi K; Abe M; Kawai K; Nakao K; Ando K; Tanabe K; Ikari Y; Morino Y; Kadota K; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kimura T;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 7(4):407-417. PubMed ID: 35234821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes.
    Liew D; De Abreu Lourenço R; Adena M; Chim L; Aylward P
    Clin Ther; 2013 Aug; 35(8):1110-1117.e9. PubMed ID: 23891361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effectiveness analysis of combination antiplatelet therapy for high-risk acute coronary syndromes: clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone.
    Schleinitz MD; Heidenreich PA
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 Feb; 142(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 15710958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Watanabe H; Domei T; Morimoto T; Natsuaki M; Shiomi H; Toyota T; Ohya M; Suwa S; Takagi K; Nanasato M; Hata Y; Yagi M; Suematsu N; Yokomatsu T; Takamisawa I; Doi M; Noda T; Okayama H; Seino Y; Tada T; Sakamoto H; Hibi K; Abe M; Kawai K; Nakao K; Ando K; Tanabe K; Ikari Y; Hanaoka KI; Morino Y; Kozuma K; Kadota K; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kimura T;
    JAMA; 2019 Jun; 321(24):2414-2427. PubMed ID: 31237644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Jiang M; You JH
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 2017 Feb; 31(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 27924429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clopidogrel: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
    Lyseng-Williamson KA; Plosker GL
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(7):709-26. PubMed ID: 16802846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Pharmacogenetic Testing in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Dong OM; Wheeler SB; Cruden G; Lee CR; Voora D; Dusetzina SB; Wiltshire T
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 31952675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of different treatment durations of clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and value of information analysis.
    Rogowski W; Burch J; Palmer S; Craigs C; Golder S; Woolacott N
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-77. PubMed ID: 19573471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pooled Analysis of the SMART-DATE and SMART-CHOICE Trials.
    Song PS; Park YH; Oh JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Cho DK; Rha SW; Bae JW; Jeong JO; Hahn JY;
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 150():47-54. PubMed ID: 34011436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Turkey.
    Davies A; Bakhai A; Schmitt C; Barrett A; Graham-Clarke P; Sculpher M
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(4):510-21. PubMed ID: 23339464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.