These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30471462)

  • 1. Supervised learning for bone shape and cortical thickness estimation from CT images for finite element analysis.
    Chandran V; Maquer G; Gerig T; Zysset P; Reyes M
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Feb; 52():42-55. PubMed ID: 30471462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical Note: Cortical thickness and density estimation from clinical CT using a prior thickness-density relationship.
    Humbert L; Hazrati Marangalou J; Del Río Barquero LM; van Lenthe GH; van Rietbergen B
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1945. PubMed ID: 27036590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation.
    Chai X; van Herk M; Hulshof MC; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 22225275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur.
    Schileo E; Pitocchi J; Falcinelli C; Taddei F
    Bone; 2020 Jul; 136():115348. PubMed ID: 32240847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
    Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur?
    Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Pakdel A; Whyne C; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():337-351. PubMed ID: 27450036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of femoral strength using 3D finite element models reconstructed from DXA images: validation against experiments.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Ristinmaa M; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):989-1000. PubMed ID: 28004226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image-based vs. mesh-based statistical appearance models of the human femur: implications for finite element simulations.
    Bonaretti S; Seiler C; Boichon C; Reyes M; Büchler P
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25271191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping anisotropy of the proximal femur for enhanced image based finite element analysis.
    Enns-Bray WS; Owoc JS; Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3272-8. PubMed ID: 25219361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur.
    Grassi L; Schileo E; Boichon C; Viceconti M; Taddei F
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Oct; 36(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 25128959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for the automatic mesh generation of bone segments from CT data.
    Viceconti M; Zannoni C; Testi D; Cappello A
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10356679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
    Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy assessment of CT-based outer surface femur meshes.
    Gelaude F; Vander Sloten J; Lauwers B
    Comput Aided Surg; 2008 Jul; 13(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 18622793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic multi-parametric quantification of the proximal femur with quantitative computed tomography.
    Carballido-Gamio J; Bonaretti S; Saeed I; Harnish R; Recker R; Burghardt AJ; Keyak JH; Harris T; Khosla S; Lang TF
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2015 Aug; 5(4):552-68. PubMed ID: 26435919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the bone endocortical region using clinical CT.
    Pearson RA; Treece GM
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():28-40. PubMed ID: 29179157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully automatic segmentation of femurs with medullary canal definition in high and in low resolution CT scans.
    Almeida DF; Ruben RB; Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Audenaert E; Verhegghe B; De Beule M
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1474-1480. PubMed ID: 27751655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel registration-based methodology for prediction of trabecular bone fabric from clinical QCT: A comprehensive analysis.
    Chandran V; Reyes M; Zysset P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187874. PubMed ID: 29176881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.