228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30471944)
1. Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.
Bottalico P; Codino J; Cantor-Cutiva LC; Marks K; Nudelman CJ; Skeffington J; Shrivastav R; Jackson-Menaldi MC; Hunter EJ; Rubin AD
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):320-334. PubMed ID: 30471944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels.
Kisenwether JS; Sataloff RT
J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mobile Communication Devices, Ambient Noise, and Acoustic Voice Measures.
Maryn Y; Ysenbaert F; Zarowski A; Vanspauwen R
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):248.e11-248.e23. PubMed ID: 27692682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
Jannetts S; Lowit A
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Bahr R; Watts S; Boyer M; Budinsky R; ; Bensoussan Y
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise.
Uloza V; Ulozaitė-Stanienė N; Petrauskas T; Kregždytė R
J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
Kopf LM; Jackson-Menaldi C; Rubin AD; Skeffington J; Hunter EJ; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R
J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effect of Microphone Frequency Response on Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice: An Examination of Low-Cost Electret Headset Microphones.
Awan SN; Shaikh MA; Desjardins M; Feinstein H; Abbott KV
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2022 Mar; 31(2):959-973. PubMed ID: 35050724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research.
Lebacq J; Schoentgen J; Cantarella G; Bruss FT; Manfredi C; DeJonckere P
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation.
Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech Adjustments for Room Acoustics and Their Effects on Vocal Effort.
Bottalico P
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):392.e1-392.e12. PubMed ID: 28029555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence.
Stone D; McCabe P; Palme CE; Heard R; Eastwood C; Riffat F; Madill C
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 25301299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research.
Manfredi C; Lebacq J; Cantarella G; Schoentgen J; Orlandi S; Bandini A; DeJonckere PH
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):111.e1-111.e7. PubMed ID: 27068549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
Franca MC
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acoustic Analyses of Prolonged Vowels in Young Adults With Friedreich Ataxia.
Carson C; Ryalls J; Hardin-Hollingsworth K; Le Normand MT; Ruddy B
J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26454768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
