314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30473175)
1. Dispersion in Tissue-Mimicking Gels Measured with Shear Wave Elastography and Torsional Vibration Rheometry.
Yengul SS; Barbone PE; Madore B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):586-604. PubMed ID: 30473175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical characterization of ex vivo human brain using ultrasound shear wave spectroscopy.
Nicolas E; Callé S; Nicolle S; Mitton D; Remenieras JP
Ultrasonics; 2018 Mar; 84():119-125. PubMed ID: 29112910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUV on gelatin phantoms.
Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Chen Q; An KN; Greenleaf JF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1706-14. PubMed ID: 21317078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kelvin-Voigt Parameters Reconstruction of Cervical Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms Using Torsional Wave Elastography.
Callejas A; Gomez A; Faris IH; Melchor J; Rus G
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31349721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between shear wave dispersion magneto motive ultrasound and transient elastography for measuring tissue-mimicking phantom viscoelasticity.
Almeida TW; Sampaio DR; Bruno AC; Pavan TZ; Carneiro AA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Dec; 62(12):2138-45. PubMed ID: 26670853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound viscoelasticity assessment using an adaptive torsional shear wave propagation method.
Ouared A; Kazemirad S; Montagnon E; Cloutier G
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1603. PubMed ID: 27036560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arterial Stiffness Estimation by Shear Wave Elastography: Validation in Phantoms with Mechanical Testing.
Maksuti E; Widman E; Larsson D; Urban MW; Larsson M; Bjällmark A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):308-21. PubMed ID: 26454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of five viscoelastic models for estimating viscoelastic parameters using ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Zhou B; Zhang X
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():109-116. PubMed ID: 29879581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic quantification of differences in shear wave elastography estimates between linear-elastic and viscoelastic material assumptionsa).
Bisht SR; Paul A; Patel P; Thareja P; Mercado-Shekhar KP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Mar; 155(3):2025-2036. PubMed ID: 38470185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loss tangent and complex modulus estimated by acoustic radiation force creep and shear wave dispersion.
Amador C; Urban MW; Chen S; Greenleaf JF
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1263-82. PubMed ID: 22345425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear wave speed and dispersion measurements using crawling wave chirps.
Hah Z; Partin A; Parker KJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2014 Oct; 36(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 24658144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four different techniques to evaluate the elastic properties of phantom in elastography: is there a gold standard?
Oudry J; Lynch T; Vappou J; Sandrin L; Miette V
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5775-93. PubMed ID: 25208061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indentation Measurements to Validate Dynamic Elasticity Imaging Methods.
Altahhan KN; Wang Y; Sobh N; Insana MF
Ultrason Imaging; 2016 Sep; 38(5):332-45. PubMed ID: 26376923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of measurement of shear modulus by ultrasound shear wave elastography in human pennate muscle.
Miyamoto N; Hirata K; Kanehisa H; Yoshitake Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124311. PubMed ID: 25853777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of a forward model of axisymmetric shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media to shear wave elastography.
Yengul SS; Barbone PE; Madore B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3266. PubMed ID: 29960488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source.
Brinker ST; Kearney SP; Royston TJ; Klatt D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probe Oscillation Shear Elastography (PROSE): A High Frame-Rate Method for Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.
Mellema DC; Song P; Kinnick RR; Urban MW; Greenleaf JF; Manduca A; Chen S
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2098-106. PubMed ID: 27076352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
