380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30473384)
1. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment-related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Witt Nyström P; Traneus E; Dasu A
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):342-351. PubMed ID: 31705671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Relative to Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Increased Vertebral Column Sparing in Craniospinal Irradiation in Growing Pediatric Patients.
Giantsoudi D; Seco J; Eaton BR; Simeone FJ; Kooy H; Yock TI; Tarbell NJ; DeLaney TF; Adams J; Paganetti H; MacDonald SM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 May; 98(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28587051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy?
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald S; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 29726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Multiple Beams on Plan Quality, Linear Energy Transfer Distribution, and Plan Robustness of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Chen Z; Wang X; Yuan C; Jin X; Liu C
ACS Sens; 2021 Feb; 6(2):408-417. PubMed ID: 33125211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporation of the LETd-weighted biological dose in the evaluation of breast intensity-modulated proton therapy plans.
Liu C; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Mailhot Vega RB; Zhang Y; Indelicato DJ; Mendenhall N; Liang X
Acta Oncol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):252-259. PubMed ID: 33063569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization.
Cao W; Khabazian A; Yepes PP; Lim G; Poenisch F; Grosshans DR; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 63(1):015013. PubMed ID: 29131808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer.
Fjæra LF; Li Z; Ytre-Hauge KS; Muren LP; Indelicato DJ; Lassen-Ramshad Y; Engeseth GM; Brydøy M; Mairani A; Flampouri S; Dahl O; Stokkevåg CH
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):763-768. PubMed ID: 28423966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological dose and complication probabilities for the rectum and bladder based on linear energy transfer distributions in spot scanning proton therapy of prostate cancer.
Pedersen J; Petersen JBB; Stokkevåg CH; Ytre-Hauge KS; Flampouri S; Li Z; Mendenhall N; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 29037095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incorporating variable RBE in IMPT optimization for ependymoma.
Goudarzi HM; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14207. PubMed ID: 37985962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disregarding RBE variation in treatment plan comparison may lead to bias in favor of proton plans.
Wedenberg M; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091706. PubMed ID: 25186381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy.
Hahn C; Eulitz J; Peters N; Wohlfahrt P; Enghardt W; Richter C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6151-6162. PubMed ID: 33118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative analysis of dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET
Rana S; Traneus E; Jackson M; Tran L; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3444-3456. PubMed ID: 35194809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
