These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30473416)

  • 41. The role of ministernotomy in aortic valve surgery-A prospective randomized study.
    Vukovic PM; Milojevic P; Stojanovic I; Micovic S; Zivkovic I; Peric M; Milicic M; Milacic P; Milojevic M; Bojic M
    J Card Surg; 2019 Jun; 34(6):435-439. PubMed ID: 31017315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomised controlled trial.
    Hancock HC; Maier RH; Kasim A; Mason J; Murphy G; Goodwin A; Owens WA; Akowuah E
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e041398. PubMed ID: 33514577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Bruno P; Cammertoni F; Rosenhek R; Mazza A; Pavone N; Iafrancesco M; Nesta M; Chiariello GA; Spalletta C; Graziano G; Sanesi V; D'Errico D; Massetti M
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 31431105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women's Hospital experience.
    Neely RC; Boskovski MT; Gosev I; Kaneko T; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn LH
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Jan; 4(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 25694975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mini-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement reduces the length of stay in the cardiac intensive care unit: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Khoshbin E; Prayaga S; Kinsella J; Sutherland FW
    BMJ Open; 2011; 1(2):e000266. PubMed ID: 22116090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis.
    Ghanta RK; Lapar DJ; Kern JA; Kron IL; Speir AM; Fonner E; Quader M; Ailawadi G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Outcomes of aortic valve and concomitant ascending aorta replacement performed via a minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach.
    LaPietra A; Santana O; Pineda AM; Mihos CG; Lamelas J
    Innovations (Phila); 2014; 9(5):339-42; discussion 342. PubMed ID: 25251550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Minimally invasive aortic root replacement: a bridge too far?
    Bakir I; Casselman F; De Geest R; Wellens F; Foubert L; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2007 Feb; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17308527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
    Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
    Hiraoka A; Totsugawa T; Kuinose M; Nakajima K; Chikazawa G; Tamura K; Yoshitaka H; Sakaguchi T
    Circ J; 2014; 78(12):2876-81. PubMed ID: 25421231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety.
    Soppa G; Yates M; Viviano A; Smelt J; Valencia O; van Besouw JP; Jahangiri M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Apr; 20(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 25568258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. A safe and useful technique beyond the cosmetic benefits.
    Paredes FA; Cánovas SJ; Gil O; García-Fuster R; Hornero F; Vázquez A; Martín E; Mena A; Martínez-León J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Sep; 66(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 24773674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
    Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
    Phan K; Xie A; Di Eusanio M; Yan TD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 98(4):1499-511. PubMed ID: 25064516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement via right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy.
    Pineda AM; Santana O; Reyna J; Sarria A; Lamas GA; Lamelas J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2013 Jan; 22(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23610989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Root Surgery: Results of an Intermediate-Volume Center.
    Elghannam M; Useini D; Moustafine V; Bechtel M; Naraghi H; Strauch JT; Haldenwang PL
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 72(2):118-125. PubMed ID: 37040869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Feasibility and clinical outcome after minimally invasive valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
    Wachter K; Franke UF; Yadav R; Nagib R; Ursulescu A; Ahad S; Baumbach H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28040763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement.
    Stoliński J; Plicner D; Grudzień G; Wąsowicz M; Musiał R; Andres J; Kapelak B
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Oct; 152(4):1030-9. PubMed ID: 27449562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of minimally invasive versus conventional aortic root replacement on transfusion and postoperative wound complications in patients: A meta-analysis.
    Chen Y; Yu W; Jiang Y; Gao J; Xie D; Yu J; Li W; Liu Z; Xiong J
    Int Wound J; 2023 Sep; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 37740672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
    Kaneko T; Loberman D; Gosev I; Rassam F; McGurk S; Leacche M; Cohn L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.