These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30473855)

  • 1. Opinion formation on dynamic networks: identifying conditions for the emergence of partisan echo chambers.
    Evans T; Fu F
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(10):181122. PubMed ID: 30473855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-party love spreads more efficiently than out-party hate in online communities.
    Martin-Gutierrez S; Robles Morales JM; Torcal M; Losada JC; Benito RM
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15700. PubMed ID: 38977803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks.
    Baumann F; Lorenz-Spreen P; Sokolov IM; Starnini M
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Jan; 124(4):048301. PubMed ID: 32058741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Networked partisanship and framing: A socio-semantic network analysis of the Italian debate on migration.
    Radicioni T; Squartini T; Pavan E; Saracco F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256705. PubMed ID: 34437640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison's cure for "mischiefs of faction".
    Kawakatsu M; Lelkes Y; Levin SA; Tarnita CE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(50):. PubMed ID: 34876512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depolarization of echo chambers by random dynamical nudge.
    Currin CB; Vera SV; Khaledi-Nasab A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9234. PubMed ID: 35654942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society.
    Törnberg P; Andersson C; Lindgren K; Banisch S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258259. PubMed ID: 34634056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social Media Polarization and Echo Chambers in the Context of COVID-19: Case Study.
    Jiang J; Ren X; Ferrara E
    JMIRx Med; 2021; 2(3):e29570. PubMed ID: 34459833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Migration and political polarization in the U.S.: An analysis of the county-level migration network.
    Liu X; Andris C; Desmarais BA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225405. PubMed ID: 31756200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks.
    Santos FP; Lelkes Y; Levin SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(50):. PubMed ID: 34876508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance.
    Watkins CD; Xiao D; Perrett DI
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2996. PubMed ID: 32010029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opinion Leaders and Structural Hole Spanners Influencing Echo Chambers in Discussions About COVID-19 Vaccines on Social Media in China: Network Analysis.
    Wang D; Zhou Y; Ma F
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Nov; 24(11):e40701. PubMed ID: 36367965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social identity bias and communication network clustering interact to shape patterns of opinion dynamics.
    Steiglechner P; Smaldino PE; Moser D; Merico A
    J R Soc Interface; 2023 Dec; 20(209):20230372. PubMed ID: 38086404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.
    Henderson M; Hillygus DS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Dec; 36(6):945-60. PubMed ID: 22232419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depolarization of opinions on social networks through random nudges.
    Pal R; Kumar A; Santhanam MS
    Phys Rev E; 2023 Sep; 108(3-1):034307. PubMed ID: 37849173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. If They Say "Yes," We Say "No": Partisan Cues Increase Polarization Over National Symbols.
    Satherley N; Yogeeswaran K; Osborne D; Sibley CG
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1996-2009. PubMed ID: 30355271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment.
    Mosleh M; Martel C; Eckles D; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(7):. PubMed ID: 33563758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.
    Törnberg P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(42):e2207159119. PubMed ID: 36215484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Echo chambers and opinion dynamics explain the occurrence of vaccination hesitancy.
    Müller J; Tellier A; Kurschilgen M
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Oct; 9(10):220367. PubMed ID: 36312563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partisan strength, political trust and generalized trust in the United States: An analysis of the General Social Survey, 1972-2014.
    Hooghe M; Oser J
    Soc Sci Res; 2017 Nov; 68():132-146. PubMed ID: 29108592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.