306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30474314)
1. Biomechanical changes in the cornea following cataract surgery: A prospective assessment with the Corneal Visualisation Scheimpflug Technology.
Wallace HB; Misra SL; Li SS; McKelvie J
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 47(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 30474314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Cataract Surgery.
Hirasawa K; Nakakura S; Nakao Y; Fujino Y; Matsuura M; Murata H; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 195():26-35. PubMed ID: 30071213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cataract surgery causes biomechanical alterations to the eye detectable by Corvis ST tonometry.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Asaoka R; Matsuya K; Fujio Y; Kiuchi Y;
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171941. PubMed ID: 28222145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Felletti M; Grasso L; Brusini P
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.
Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST.
Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in ocular biomechanics after femtosecond laser creation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap.
Leccisotti A; Fields SV; Moore J; Shah S; Moore TC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 26948787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].
Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P
Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery.
Hassan Z; Modis L; Szalai E; Berta A; Nemeth G
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Oct; 37(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 24894545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery.
Simsek T; Soba DO; Tırhış MH; Yılmazbaş P; Öztürk F
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e198-203. PubMed ID: 26521752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal biomechanical parameters in systemic autoimmune diseases.
Ozarslan Ozcan D; Ozcan SC; Kimyon G
Clin Exp Optom; 2022 Jan; 105(1):61-64. PubMed ID: 33719873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].
Steinberg J; Mehlan J; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ
Ophthalmologe; 2015 Sep; 112(9):770-7. PubMed ID: 25501931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry.
Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Vestergaard AH; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 252(8):1329-35. PubMed ID: 24862302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
