These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30474864)

  • 1. Parliamentary identity and the management of the far-right: A discursive analysis of Dutch parliamentary debates.
    Verkuyten M; Nooitgedagt W
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Jul; 58(3):495-514. PubMed ID: 30474864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mobilizing support for the extreme right: a discursive analysis of minority leadership.
    Rooyackers IN; Verkuyten M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):130-48. PubMed ID: 22435847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: out-group ideology and the five-step social identity model.
    Verkuyten M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 22074206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring Emotion in Parliamentary Debates with Automated Textual Analysis.
    Rheault L; Beelen K; Cochrane C; Hirst G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168843. PubMed ID: 28006016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parliamentary cultures and human embryos: the Dutch and British debates compared.
    Kirejczyk M
    Soc Stud Sci; 1999 Dec; 29(6):889-912. PubMed ID: 11624111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. M. N. Roy and the Problem of Parliamentary Democracy.
    Parasher T
    J Hist Ideas; 2024; 85(3):601-626. PubMed ID: 39069909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Party Politics vs. Grievance Politics: Competing Modes of Representative Democracy.
    Flinders M; Hinterleitner M
    Society; 2022; 59(6):672-681. PubMed ID: 35308828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The parliamentary political agenda: a tool for policy analysis of diabetes priorities in Spain.
    Agudelo-Suárez AA; Ruiz-Cantero MT; González-Zapata LI; Restrepo-Medrano JC; Ortiz-Barreda GM
    Gac Sanit; 2012; 26(6):554-9. PubMed ID: 22560240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science, democracy, and the right to research.
    Brown MB; Guston DH
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2009 Sep; 15(3):351-66. PubMed ID: 19434517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The New Right and family politics.
    Somerville J
    Econ Soc; 1992 May; 21(2):93-128. PubMed ID: 12317778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rigidity of the far-right? Motivated social cognition in a nationally representative sample of Hungarians on the eve of the far-right breakthrough in the 2010 elections.
    Lönnqvist JE; Szabó ZP; Kelemen L
    Int J Psychol; 2019 Jun; 54(3):292-296. PubMed ID: 29700816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weather conditions and political party vote share in Dutch national parliament elections, 1971-2010.
    Eisinga R; Te Grotenhuis M; Pelzer B
    Int J Biometeorol; 2012 Nov; 56(6):1161-5. PubMed ID: 22065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divergence over conformity: Change in immigration attitudes after the electoral success of an anti-immigration populist party in the Finnish 2015 parliamentary elections.
    Lönnqvist JE; Mannerström R; Leikas S
    Int J Psychol; 2019 Jun; 54(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 29869331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'You truly are the worst kind of racist!': Argumentation and polarization in online discussions around gender and radical-right populism.
    Pettersson K; Sakki I
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):119-135. PubMed ID: 35765889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The insides and outsides of parliamentary politics: Introduction to a special section of
    Dányi E
    Soc Stud Sci; 2020 Apr; 50(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 32089123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Greatest Right of Them All: The Debate on the Right to Petition in the Netherlands from the Dutch Republic to the Kingdom (c. 1750-1830).
    Oddens J
    Eur Hist Q; 2017 Oct; 47(4):634-656. PubMed ID: 29527085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda.
    Huber LM; Bodlos A; Graf E; Meyer TM
    Party Politics; 2022 Mar; 28(2):365-376. PubMed ID: 35281722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistics in Dutch policy debates on health and healthcare.
    Gerrits RG; van den Berg MJ; Klazinga NS; Kringos DS
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Jun; 17(1):55. PubMed ID: 31159828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.
    Martin A; Orr R; Peyton K; Faulkner N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0225818. PubMed ID: 32092084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Between everyday politics and political elites: transmission and coupling within Westminster's parliamentary e-petitions system.
    Matthews F
    Br Politics; 2023; 18(2):279-299. PubMed ID: 37168140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.